build: update core ~4.1, math~4.2, physics ~10.1

[vishwa2710]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated dependency versions for improved performance and compatibility:
    • open-space-toolkit-core to version ~4.1
    • open-space-toolkit-mathematics to version ~4.2
    • open-space-toolkit-physics to version ~10.1

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updating the version specifications of several dependencies listed in the bindings/python/requirements.txt file. Specifically, the versions for open-space-toolkit-core, open-space-toolkit-mathematics, and open-space-toolkit-physics have been incremented to newer versions, while open-space-toolkit-io remains unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
bindings/python/requirements.txt	Updated open-space-toolkit-core from ~4.0 to ~4.1, open-space-toolkit-mathematics from ~4.1 to ~4.2, and open-space-toolkit-physics from ~10.0 to ~10.1. open-space-toolkit-io remains at ~4.0.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant System
    User->>System: Request to update dependencies
    System->>System: Check current versions
    System->>System: Update open-space-toolkit-core to ~4.1
    System->>System: Update open-space-toolkit-mathematics to ~4.2
    System->>System: Update open-space-toolkit-physics to ~10.1
    System->>User: Confirm updates completed

Loading

🐇 "In the garden, we hop and play,
New versions bloom, hip-hip-hooray!
Dependencies fresh, like morning dew,
With every change, we grow anew!
Let's leap with joy, for progress is here,
A world of updates, we hold so dear!" 🌼

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee261aa and a5eb63c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• bindings/python/requirements.txt (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (5)

bindings/python/requirements.txt (5)

Line range hint 1-7: Overall changes look good.

The updates to the dependency versions are consistent with the PR objectives. The file structure and formatting have been maintained. Please ensure to verify compatibility with the updated toolkits as suggested in the previous comments.

---

6-6: LGTM. Verify compatibility with the updated physics toolkit.

The update of open-space-toolkit-physics from ~10.0 to ~10.1 is a minor version bump, which should maintain backwards compatibility. However, it's advisable to verify that this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes in your project.

To ensure compatibility, please run the following script to check for any potential issues:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with the updated open-space-toolkit-physics

# Test: Search for imports of open_space_toolkit.physics
echo "Checking imports of open_space_toolkit.physics:"
rg --type python "from open_space_toolkit import physics" || echo "No direct imports found."

# Test: Search for usage of physics module
echo "Checking usage of physics module:"
rg --type python "physics\." -A 3 || echo "No usage of physics module found."

# Note: These checks provide a starting point. Thorough testing is recommended.

---

3-3: LGTM. Verify compatibility with the updated core toolkit.

The update of open-space-toolkit-core from ~4.0 to ~4.1 is a minor version bump, which should maintain backwards compatibility. However, it's advisable to verify that this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes in your project.

To ensure compatibility, please run the following script to check for any potential issues:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with the updated open-space-toolkit-core

# Test: Search for imports of open_space_toolkit.core
echo "Checking imports of open_space_toolkit.core:"
rg --type python "from open_space_toolkit import core" || echo "No direct imports found."

# Test: Search for usage of core module
echo "Checking usage of core module:"
rg --type python "core\." -A 3 || echo "No usage of core module found."

# Note: These checks provide a starting point. Thorough testing is recommended.

---

4-4: Verify if open-space-toolkit-io needs an update.

While other dependencies have been updated, open-space-toolkit-io remains at version ~4.0. Could you please verify if this dependency also needs an update, or if there's a specific reason for keeping it at the current version?

To check for the latest version of open-space-toolkit-io, you can run:

---

5-5: LGTM. Verify compatibility with the updated mathematics toolkit.

The update of open-space-toolkit-mathematics from ~4.1 to ~4.2 is a minor version bump, which should maintain backwards compatibility. However, it's advisable to verify that this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes in your project.

To ensure compatibility, please run the following script to check for any potential issues:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM. Compatibility with the updated mathematics toolkit verified.

No direct imports of open_space_toolkit.mathematics were found. The usage of the mathematics module in test files indicates that the update should maintain compatibility. Nevertheless, thorough testing is recommended.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with the updated open-space-toolkit-mathematics

# Test: Search for imports of open_space_toolkit.mathematics
echo "Checking imports of open_space_toolkit.mathematics:"
rg --type python "from open_space_toolkit import mathematics" || echo "No direct imports found."

# Test: Search for usage of mathematics module
echo "Checking usage of mathematics module:"
rg --type python "mathematics\." -A 3 || echo "No usage of mathematics module found."

# Note: These checks provide a starting point. Thorough testing is recommended.

Length of output: 663

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-check for potential compatibility issues with the updated open-space-toolkit-mathematics

# Test: Search for imports of open_space_toolkit.mathematics
echo "Checking imports of open_space_toolkit.mathematics:"
rg --type py "from open_space_toolkit\.mathematics" || echo "No direct imports found."

# Test: Search for usage of mathematics module
echo "Checking usage of mathematics module:"
rg --type py "mathematics\." -A 3 || echo "No usage of mathematics module found."

# Note: These checks provide a starting point. Thorough testing is recommended.

Length of output: 8059

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.92%. Comparing base (57f7d7c) to head (a5eb63c).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #449   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.92%   90.92%           
=======================================
  Files          85       85           
  Lines        8618     8618           
=======================================
  Hits         7836     7836           
  Misses        782      782           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.