feat: add update_target binding to EventCondition #457
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
bindings/python/test/test_event_condition.py (2)
19-19: Document the evaluator return value choice.The evaluator's return value has been changed from 0.0 to 5.0. Please add a comment explaining why this specific value was chosen and its significance in the test context.
64-77: Enhance test coverage for update_target.While the test verifies that value_offset changes, consider these improvements:
- Add a docstring explaining the test's purpose and expected behavior
- Test with non-zero state values to ensure proper calculation
- Assert specific value_offset changes rather than just inequality
Example improvement:
def test_update_target( self, event_condition: EventCondition, ): + """ + Test that update_target correctly updates the target's value_offset based on the provided state. + """ current_target_value_offset: float = event_condition.get_target().value_offset event_condition.update_target( State( Instant.J2000(), - Position.meters([0.0, 0.0, 0.0], Frame.GCRF()), - Velocity.meters_per_second([0.0, 0.0, 0.0], Frame.GCRF()), + Position.meters([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], Frame.GCRF()), + Velocity.meters_per_second([0.1, 0.2, 0.3], Frame.GCRF()), ) ) - assert event_condition.get_target().value_offset != current_target_value_offset + new_offset = event_condition.get_target().value_offset + assert new_offset != current_target_value_offset + # Add assertion for expected offset value based on the state
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
bindings/python/src/OpenSpaceToolkitAstrodynamicsPy/EventCondition.cpp(3 hunks)bindings/python/test/test_event_condition.py(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
bindings/python/test/test_event_condition.py (2)
5-7: LGTM: Required imports added for State construction.
The new imports are necessary for constructing the State object in the update_target test.
29-29: Document the target type change implications.
The target type has been changed from Absolute to Relative, which is a significant semantic change. Please add documentation explaining:
- The difference between Absolute and Relative target types
- Why this change was necessary
- The implications for event condition behavior
Let's check if this change is consistent across the test suite:
bindings/python/src/OpenSpaceToolkitAstrodynamicsPy/EventCondition.cpp (3)
144-144: LGTM: Documentation type update is accurate.
The change from Real to float in the documentation better reflects the Python type system.
156-164: LGTM: Well-structured property binding.
The value_offset property is correctly implemented as read-only and follows proper Python naming conventions while maintaining C++ conventions internally.
245-255: Consider enhancing the documentation and verify error handling.
While the binding is correctly implemented, consider the following improvements:
-
The documentation could be more specific about:
- When this method should be called in the event condition lifecycle
- What happens if called on a non-relative target
- Any potential exceptions that might be thrown
-
Verify that the underlying C++ implementation properly handles:
- Invalid state parameters
- Thread safety considerations if used in concurrent scenarios
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #457 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.93% 90.93%
=======================================
Files 85 85
Lines 8624 8624
=======================================
Hits 7842 7842
Misses 782 782 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
apaletta3
force-pushed
the
feat/add-update-target-to-event-condition
branch
from
22f16ed to
2d5d52a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
bindings/python/test/test_event_condition.py (1)
64-77: Consider enhancing test coverage with additional scenariosWhile the basic functionality is tested, consider adding test cases with:
- Non-zero position and velocity vectors
- Different epochs
- Edge cases for value_offset changes
Example enhancement:
def test_update_target_with_various_states(self, event_condition: EventCondition): test_cases = [ ([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], [0.1, 0.2, 0.3]), # Non-zero case ([1e6, 1e6, 1e6], [1e3, 1e3, 1e3]), # Large values ([0.0, 0.0, 0.0], [0.0, 0.0, 0.0]), # Zero case ] for position, velocity in test_cases: initial_offset = event_condition.get_target().value_offset event_condition.update_target( State( Instant.J2000(), Position.meters(position, Frame.GCRF()), Velocity.meters_per_second(velocity, Frame.GCRF()), ) ) assert event_condition.get_target().value_offset != initial_offsetbindings/python/src/OpenSpaceToolkitAstrodynamicsPy/EventCondition.cpp (1)
245-255: Consider clarifying behavior for absolute targets.The
update_targetmethod binding looks good, but the documentation could be more specific about what happens when this method is called on an event condition with an absolute target.Consider updating the docstring to clarify the behavior:
.def( "update_target", &EventCondition::updateTarget, R"doc( - Update the target value if the event condition is relative. + Update the target value if the event condition is relative. Has no effect if the target is absolute. Args: state (State): The state to calculate the relative target from. )doc", arg("state") )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
bindings/python/src/OpenSpaceToolkitAstrodynamicsPy/EventCondition.cpp(3 hunks)bindings/python/test/test_event_condition.py(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
bindings/python/test/test_event_condition.py (3)
5-7: LGTM: New imports are properly organized
The added imports are necessary for constructing State objects in the new test case and follow the project's import organization pattern.
29-29: Verify target type change implications
The target type has been changed from Absolute to Relative. This is a significant change that affects how target values are interpreted.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of Target.Type to ensure consistency
rg "Target\.Type\.(Absolute|Relative)" --type cpp --type python19-19: Verify the impact of evaluator value change
The evaluator's return value has been changed from 0.0 to 5.0. This could affect other test cases that depend on this fixture.
✅ Verification successful
Change in evaluator fixture return value is safe
The evaluator fixture's change from 0.0 to 5.0 is safe because:
- The test cases only verify the existence of the evaluator (
is not None), not its return value - No other test files import or use this fixture
- The evaluator is only used in
test_event_condition.pyas part of testing the baseEventConditionclass interface - Derived condition classes in
event_condition/directory implement their own evaluators and don't depend on this fixture
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other test cases using this evaluator fixture
rg -l "def test.*evaluator.*fixture" bindings/python/test/
Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test cases using evaluator in the test file and its imports
rg -A 5 "evaluator" bindings/python/test/test_event_condition.py
Length of output: 863
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any other test files that might import or use this test file
rg -l "from.*test_event_condition.*import" bindings/python/test/
Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all test files in the python bindings to understand the test structure
fd "test_.*\.py$" bindings/python/test/
Length of output: 3621
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of EventCondition in other test files
rg -A 5 "EventCondition" bindings/python/test/event_condition/
# Also check the base test file
rg -A 5 "EventCondition" bindings/python/test/test_event_condition.py
Length of output: 5991
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any test cases that specifically test the evaluator's return value
rg -B 2 -A 5 "assert.*evaluator" bindings/python/test/
Length of output: 707
bindings/python/src/OpenSpaceToolkitAstrodynamicsPy/EventCondition.cpp (2)
144-144: LGTM: Documentation update improves Python type clarity.
The type annotation change from Real to float better reflects the Python type system.
156-164: LGTM: Well-documented read-only property addition.
The value_offset property is properly implemented with:
- Correct read-only access
- Clear documentation of its purpose for relative targets
- Proper Python naming conventions
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
update_targetmethod in theEventConditionclass for updating target values.value_offsetin theTargetclass.Bug Fixes
valueproperty type fromRealtofloatfor better accuracy.Tests
update_targetfunctionality.