Skip to content

Conversation

@pratik-mahalle
Copy link

Fixes #6803

Changes

Fixed precision issues when using Histogram<float> with custom HistogramBucketBoundaries.

Problem: Float values like 0.025f were being converted to double with precision errors, resulting in bucket boundaries like 0.02500000037252903.

Solution: For float types, convert to string first (which preserves the intended decimal representation) then parse as double. This ensures clean bucket boundaries (e.g., 0.025f0.025).

Other numeric types (int, long, short, byte, double) continue using the existing Convert.ToDouble() approach.

Merge requirement checklist

  • CONTRIBUTING guidelines followed (license requirements, nullable enabled, static analysis, etc.)
  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Appropriate CHANGELOG.md files updated for non-trivial changes
  • Changes in public API reviewed (if applicable)

Signed-off-by: Pratik Mahalle <mahallepratik683@gmail.com>
@pratik-mahalle pratik-mahalle requested a review from a team as a code owner February 1, 2026 16:03
@github-actions github-actions bot added the pkg:OpenTelemetry Issues related to OpenTelemetry NuGet package label Feb 1, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2026

❌ 2 Tests Failed:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
2488 2 2486 10
View the top 2 failed test(s) by shortest run time
OpenTelemetry.Metrics.Tests.MetricViewTests::HistogramWithFloatAdviceBoundaries_MaintainsPrecision
Stack Traces | 0.00458s run time
at OpenTelemetry.Metrics.Tests.MetricViewTests.HistogramWithFloatAdviceBoundaries_MaintainsPrecision() in C:\a\opentelemetry-dotnet\opentelemetry-dotnet\test\OpenTelemetry.Tests\Metrics\MetricViewTests.cs:line 824
   at System.RuntimeMethodHandle.InvokeMethod(Object target, Void** arguments, Signature sig, Boolean isConstructor)
   at System.Reflection.MethodBaseInvoker.InvokeWithNoArgs(Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr)
OpenTelemetry.Metrics.Tests.MetricViewTests::HistogramWithFloatAdviceBoundaries_MaintainsPrecision
Stack Traces | 0.0137s run time
at OpenTelemetry.Metrics.Tests.MetricViewTests.HistogramWithFloatAdviceBoundaries_MaintainsPrecision() in C:\a\opentelemetry-dotnet\opentelemetry-dotnet\test\OpenTelemetry.Tests\Metrics\MetricViewTests.cs:line 824
   at System.RuntimeMethodHandle.InvokeMethod(Object target, Void** arguments, Signature sig, Boolean isConstructor)
   at System.Reflection.MethodBaseInvoker.InvokeWithNoArgs(Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr)

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.

Signed-off-by: Pratik Mahalle <mahallepratik683@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mahalle <mahallepratik683@gmail.com>
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request fixes a floating-point precision issue when using Histogram<float> with custom HistogramBucketBoundaries. The problem occurred when float values like 0.025f were converted to double, resulting in precision errors like 0.02500000037252903 instead of the intended 0.025.

Changes:

  • Modified float-to-double conversion for histogram bucket boundaries to preserve decimal precision
  • Added comprehensive test to verify the precision fix works correctly

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
src/OpenTelemetry/Metrics/MetricStreamIdentity.cs Implemented float-to-string-to-double conversion to preserve decimal precision for float histogram boundaries
test/OpenTelemetry.Tests/Metrics/MetricViewTests.cs Added test to verify float histogram boundaries maintain proper precision

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Signed-off-by: Pratik Mahalle <mahallepratik683@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mahalle <mahallepratik683@gmail.com>
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines 773 to 820
// Record some values
histogram.Record(0.02f);
histogram.Record(0.5f);
histogram.Record(5.0f);

meterProvider.ForceFlush(MaxTimeToAllowForFlush);
Assert.Single(exportedItems);
var metric = exportedItems[0];

List<MetricPoint> metricPoints = [];
foreach (ref readonly var mp in metric.GetMetricPoints())
{
metricPoints.Add(mp);
}

Assert.Single(metricPoints);
var histogramPoint = metricPoints[0];

// Verify the bucket boundaries maintain proper precision
// The key assertion is that the boundaries should be clean decimal values
// not values with floating-point precision errors like 0.02500000037252903

// Expected clean boundaries (converted from float to double with proper precision)
var expectedBoundaries = new double[]
{
0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 30, 60, 120,
};

var index = 0;
foreach (var histogramMeasurement in histogramPoint.GetHistogramBuckets())
{
if (index < expectedBoundaries.Length)
{
// Verify each boundary is the expected clean value
Assert.Equal(expectedBoundaries[index], histogramMeasurement.ExplicitBound);
}
else
{
// Verify the last bucket is positive infinity
Assert.Equal(double.PositiveInfinity, histogramMeasurement.ExplicitBound);
}

index++;
}

// Verify we got the expected number of buckets
Assert.Equal(expectedBoundaries.Length + 1, index);
}
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test validates that exported ExplicitBound values look “clean”, but it doesn’t guard against a potential semantic regression where recording a value exactly equal to a float boundary (e.g., histogram.Record(0.025f) or 0.1f) no longer increments the expected bucket due to the float->double boundary conversion. Add an assertion that a boundary-equal float measurement lands in the correct (inclusive) bucket to catch this.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +200 to +208
// For float types, convert to string first to preserve the intended decimal precision
// and avoid floating-point representation issues (e.g., 0.025f -> 0.025 instead of 0.02500000037252903)
explicitBucketBoundaries[i] = typeof(T) == typeof(float)
? double.Parse(
Convert.ToString(adviceExplicitBucketBoundaries[i], CultureInfo.InvariantCulture)!,
CultureInfo.InvariantCulture)
: Convert.ToDouble(
adviceExplicitBucketBoundaries[i],
CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new float-handling path converts bucket boundaries from float -> string -> double. This changes the numeric boundary used for bucketing (e.g., 0.1f is recorded as 0.10000000149011612 via the float measurement callback, but the boundary becomes 0.1), which can shift measurements at/near the boundary into a different bucket (breaking the “upper bound inclusive” behavior for values equal to the provided float boundary). Consider keeping internal bucketing bounds as the exact float value (float-cast-to-double) and only “cleaning” the values at export/serialization time (or store separate arrays for lookup vs. exported explicit bounds).

Suggested change
// For float types, convert to string first to preserve the intended decimal precision
// and avoid floating-point representation issues (e.g., 0.025f -> 0.025 instead of 0.02500000037252903)
explicitBucketBoundaries[i] = typeof(T) == typeof(float)
? double.Parse(
Convert.ToString(adviceExplicitBucketBoundaries[i], CultureInfo.InvariantCulture)!,
CultureInfo.InvariantCulture)
: Convert.ToDouble(
adviceExplicitBucketBoundaries[i],
CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
if (typeof(T) == typeof(float))
{
// For float types, preserve the exact numeric value by casting directly from float to double.
// This avoids changing the numeric boundary (e.g., 0.10000000149011612f) while still promoting
// to double for internal bucketing comparisons.
explicitBucketBoundaries[i] = (double)(float)(object)adviceExplicitBucketBoundaries[i]!;
}
else
{
explicitBucketBoundaries[i] = Convert.ToDouble(
adviceExplicitBucketBoundaries[i],
CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Author

@pratik-mahalle pratik-mahalle Feb 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current fix (converting float→string→double) changes the numeric boundary used for bucketing, which could cause boundary-equal measurements to land in the wrong bucket:

When recording 0.025f, the value becomes 0.02500000037252903 (float cast to double)
With this fix, the boundary becomes 0.025 (clean double)
Result: 0.02500000037252903 > 0.025, so the measurement lands in the NEXT bucket

Options:

  • Fix at export time only - Keep exact float values for internal bucketing, but clean them when exporting/serializing bucket labels
  • Document as expected behavior - Users should use Histogram with double boundaries to avoid precision issues

What should I do ? @martincostello @cijothomas

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added some additional tests in #6869 to cover different histogram types (here), and there's assertions for buckets included in those.

Maybe add those to this PR and see what the behaviour is with MultithreadedSingleCounterTest unskipped?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay, Iets see, that works or not

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Signed-off-by: Pratik Mahalle <mahallepratik683@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pratik Mahalle <mahallepratik683@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pkg:OpenTelemetry Issues related to OpenTelemetry NuGet package

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[bug] wrong precision for Histogram buckets with float type

2 participants