Skip to content

chore(examples): lint examples/express using shared top-level eslint config #2894

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 26, 2025

Conversation

trentm
Copy link
Contributor

@trentm trentm commented Jun 25, 2025

Refs: #2891

@trentm trentm self-assigned this Jun 25, 2025
@trentm trentm requested a review from a team as a code owner June 25, 2025 22:06
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.76%. Comparing base (2819660) to head (e65363a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2894   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.76%   89.76%           
=======================================
  Files         187      187           
  Lines        9149     9149           
  Branches     1885     1885           
=======================================
  Hits         8213     8213           
  Misses        936      936           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@trentm trentm enabled auto-merge (squash) June 26, 2025 17:32
@trentm trentm merged commit daa2261 into open-telemetry:main Jun 26, 2025
20 checks passed
@trentm trentm deleted the trentm-lint-examples-express branch June 27, 2025 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants