fix(practitioner-role-code): create migrations for unifying role format

[makelicious]

TL:DR; Our format for "coding" PractitionerRole has changed during the years. Ensure both PractitionerRole and PractitionerRole_history follow the latest format.

Example:

// Code is a 2-tuple
{
  "code": [
    {
      "coding": [
        {
          "system": "http://opencrvs.org/specs/roles",
          "code": "LOCAL_REGISTRAR"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "coding": [
        {
          "system": "http://opencrvs.org/specs/types",
           // "code": "LOCAL_REGISTRAR" <-- Initial format
           // "code": "Local Registrar" <-- Second format
          "code": "[{ label: \"Local Registrar\", lang: \"en\" },{ label: \"Registraire local\", lang: \"fr\" }]" //  Current format, allows localization
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

The previous migration (20230127063226-update-practitioner-role) has been changed along with the format. However, it might not work for all migrations paths.

Solution:

• Write migrations to ensure the format is unified, independent from which version we are migrating from
• Run migrations on both PractitionerRole and PractitionerRole_history

Fixes:

• Potential error during declaration download, caused by mismatch in format.

Relevant previous changes:

• First format change
• Second format change

[github-actions]

Oops! Looks like you forgot to update the changelog. When updating CHANGELOG.md, please consider the following:

• Changelog is read by country implementors who might not always be familiar with all technical details of OpenCRVS. Keep language high-level, user friendly and avoid technical references to internals.
• Answer "What's new?", "Why was the change made?" and "Why should I care?" for each change.
• If it's a breaking change, include a migration guide answering "What do I need to do to upgrade?".

[ocrvs-bot]

Your environment is deployed to https://fixpractitioner-role-code.opencrvs.dev