-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open ranges for 'z' parameter #527
Comments
@iandruska-ibl Good suggestion. Do you think it increases the Denial of Service attack risk? |
@chris-little I think that security is irrelevant (at least to a great degree) at this level of abstraction. Security is a matter of implementation. Implementations are free include mechanisms to prevent attacks at specific EDR features. For example, to prevent DoS attacks, implementations might evaluate the size of a query and deny if it is too big. No need to restrict capabilities of API because of that in my opinion (BTW, DoS attacks are usually detected/prevented at a different architecture layer, e.g., load balancers, API gateways, web proxies, etc.). |
@iandruska-ibl I agree that it makes sense for any of the query parameters which support a range input to follow the same rules. |
I wonder whether there is any reason why open ranges (e.g.,
../850
,../..
) are not specified for thez
parameter?It is an option for the
datetime
parameter (Statement F in https://docs.ogc.org/is/19-086r6/19-086r6.html#_3abf1496-c07a-41bd-9884-cd1eb5ce2dbf).I think it is equally useful for the
z
parameter. It would make thedatetime
andz
perfectly symmetrical too.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: