Skip to content

Conversation

Hamlin-Li
Copy link

@Hamlin-Li Hamlin-Li commented Sep 30, 2025

Hi,
Can you help to review this patch?

Background

In https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8352218, we introduced dependency among CPU extensions/flags. And to make sure it works, A needs to be declared before B in RV_FEATURE_FLAGS if B depends on A, for example, A is v, B is Zvfh. So in the pr an assert was introduced to make sure A is before B in RV_FEATURE_FLAGS.
But the assert does not work as expected, means if I move A below B in RV_FEATURE_FLAGS (check below for a simple patch, it's based on 7853415), it can not be caught by the assert.

diff --git a/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp b/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp
index 4214d6c53dc..80896f8fffc 100644
--- a/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp
+++ b/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp
@@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ class VM_Version : public Abstract_VM_Version {
   decl(ext_C , "c" , ('C' - 'A'), true , UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseRVC)) \
   decl(ext_Q , "q" , ('Q' - 'A'), true , NO_UPDATE_DEFAULT) \
   decl(ext_H , "h" , ('H' - 'A'), true , NO_UPDATE_DEFAULT) \
- decl(ext_V , "v" , ('V' - 'A'), true , UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseRVV)) \
   decl(ext_Zicbom , "Zicbom" , RV_NO_FLAG_BIT, true , UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseZicbom)) \
   decl(ext_Zicboz , "Zicboz" , RV_NO_FLAG_BIT, true , UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseZicboz)) \
   decl(ext_Zicbop , "Zicbop" , RV_NO_FLAG_BIT, true , UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseZicbop)) \
@@ -193,6 +192,7 @@ class VM_Version : public Abstract_VM_Version {
   decl(ext_Zvbc , "Zvbc" , RV_NO_FLAG_BIT, true , UPDATE_DEFAULT_DEP(UseZvbc, ext_V)) \
   decl(ext_Zvfh , "Zvfh" , RV_NO_FLAG_BIT, true , UPDATE_DEFAULT_DEP(UseZvfh, ext_V)) \
   decl(ext_Zvkn , "Zvkn" , RV_NO_FLAG_BIT, true , UPDATE_DEFAULT_DEP(UseZvkn, ext_V)) \
+ decl(ext_V , "v" , ('V' - 'A'), true , UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseRVV)) \
   decl(ext_Zicond , "Zicond" , RV_NO_FLAG_BIT, true , UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseZicond)) \
   decl(mvendorid , "VendorId" , RV_NO_FLAG_BIT, false, NO_UPDATE_DEFAULT) \
   decl(marchid , "ArchId" , RV_NO_FLAG_BIT, false, NO_UPDATE_DEFAULT) \

If added following patch based on the above patch, we can find out what's going on, it will trigger the assert:

# Internal Error (/home/hamlin/workspace/repos/github/jdk-master-tmp-2/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp:211), pid=430595, tid=430603
# assert((uintptr_t)(&ext_V) > (uintptr_t)(this)) failed: Invalid: dep: 140361453683696 (v), this: 140361453685240 (Zvbc)
diff --git a/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp b/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp
index 4214d6c53dc..0ba636dce96 100644
--- a/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp
+++ b/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp
@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ class VM_Version : public Abstract_VM_Version {
   void update_flag() { \
       assert(enabled(), "Must be."); \
       /* dep must be declared before */ \
- assert((uintptr_t)(this) > \
- (uintptr_t)(&dep), "Invalid");\
+ assert((uintptr_t)(&dep) > \
+ (uintptr_t)(this), "Invalid: dep: %ld (%s), this: %ld (%s)", p2i(&dep), dep.pretty(), p2i(this), pretty()); \
       if (FLAG_IS_DEFAULT(flag)) { \
         if (dep.enabled()) { \
           FLAG_SET_DEFAULT(flag, true); \

But I don't think we can rely on the address of different ext_x to determine their declaration order in RV_FEATURE_FLAGS, even if the patch above can catch it.

Fix

This patch reuses RVExtFeatureValue::_cpu_feature_index as dependent_index to check the declaration order is as expected.

Test

With the following patch, it will trigger the assert:

#  Internal Error (/home/hamlin/workspace/repos/github/jdk-master-aot/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp:120), pid=708174, tid=708177
#  assert(dependent_index() > next->dependent_index()) failed: Invalid
diff --git a/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp b/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp
index ae29bd36a10..8e602fb2413 100644
--- a/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp
+++ b/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/vm_version_riscv.hpp
@@ -277,7 +277,6 @@ class VM_Version : public Abstract_VM_Version {
   decl(ext_C            ,  c           ,     ('C' - 'A'),  true ,  UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseRVC))                                 \
   decl(ext_Q            ,  q           ,     ('Q' - 'A'),  true ,  NO_UPDATE_DEFAULT)                                      \
   decl(ext_H            ,  h           ,     ('H' - 'A'),  true ,  NO_UPDATE_DEFAULT)                                      \
-  decl(ext_V            ,  v           ,     ('V' - 'A'),  true ,  UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseRVV))                                 \
   decl(ext_Zicbom       ,  Zicbom      ,  RV_NO_FLAG_BIT,  true ,  UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseZicbom))                              \
   decl(ext_Zicboz       ,  Zicboz      ,  RV_NO_FLAG_BIT,  true ,  UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseZicboz))                              \
   decl(ext_Zicbop       ,  Zicbop      ,  RV_NO_FLAG_BIT,  true ,  UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseZicbop))                              \
@@ -301,6 +300,7 @@ class VM_Version : public Abstract_VM_Version {
   decl(ext_Zvbc         ,  Zvbc        ,  RV_NO_FLAG_BIT,  true ,  UPDATE_DEFAULT_DEP(UseZvbc, &ext_V, nullptr))           \
   decl(ext_Zvfh         ,  Zvfh        ,  RV_NO_FLAG_BIT,  true ,  UPDATE_DEFAULT_DEP(UseZvfh, &ext_V, &ext_Zfh, nullptr)) \
   decl(ext_Zvkn         ,  Zvkn        ,  RV_NO_FLAG_BIT,  true ,  UPDATE_DEFAULT_DEP(UseZvkn, &ext_V, nullptr))           \
+  decl(ext_V            ,  v           ,     ('V' - 'A'),  true ,  UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseRVV))                                 \
   decl(ext_Zicond       ,  Zicond      ,  RV_NO_FLAG_BIT,  true ,  UPDATE_DEFAULT(UseZicond))                              \

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8368950: RISC-V: fail to catch out of order declarations among dependent cpu extensions/flags (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27572/head:pull/27572
$ git checkout pull/27572

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27572
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27572/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27572

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27572

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27572.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 30, 2025

👋 Welcome back mli! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 30, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 30, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 30, 2025

@Hamlin-Li The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 30, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Webrevs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant