Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tests #38

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Feb 9, 2025
Merged

Tests #38

merged 14 commits into from
Feb 9, 2025

Conversation

sepandhaghighi
Copy link
Member

  • Tests updated
  • Minor bugs fixed

@sepandhaghighi sepandhaghighi self-assigned this Feb 7, 2025
@sepandhaghighi sepandhaghighi added this to the memor v0.1 milestone Feb 7, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

Copy link
Member

@sadrasabouri sadrasabouri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a minor comment.

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ def __init__(
:return: None
"""
self._content = None
self._title = None
self._title = "unknown"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like None better. It's more compatible with integration. Imagine someone wanted to save them in a data frame with a column named title then having some rows as None are easier to detect by NaN detectors and converting them into something better than having them as unknown.
For saving I'm also fine with that field being null when jsonified.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed in a5cb703

@sadrasabouri sadrasabouri merged commit 5e22bce into dev Feb 9, 2025
24 checks passed
@sadrasabouri sadrasabouri deleted the tests branch February 9, 2025 05:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants