Skip to content

Fix incoming webhook PLR match with generateName #1855

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

zakisk
Copy link
Contributor

@zakisk zakisk commented Dec 8, 2024

fixed an issue in PAC when pipelinerun name is defined via genetateName field on incoming webhook, it wasn't matching pipelinrun.

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVKP-6808

Changes

Submitter Checklist

  • 📝 Please ensure your commit message is clear and informative. For guidance on crafting effective commit messages, refer to the How to write a git commit message guide. We prefer the commit message to be included in the PR body itself rather than a link to an external website (ie: Jira ticket).

  • ♽ Before submitting a PR, run make test lint to avoid unnecessary CI processing. For an even more efficient workflow, consider installing pre-commit and running pre-commit install in the root of this repository.

  • ✨ We use linters to maintain clean and consistent code. Please ensure you've run make lint before submitting a PR. Some linters offer a --fix mode, which can be executed with the command make fix-linters (ensure markdownlint and golangci-lint tools are installed first).

  • 📖 If you're introducing a user-facing feature or changing existing behavior, please ensure it's properly documented.

  • 🧪 While 100% coverage isn't a requirement, we encourage unit tests for any code changes where possible.

  • 🎁 If feasible, please check if an end-to-end test can be added. See README for more details.

  • 🔎 If there's any flakiness in the CI tests, don't necessarily ignore it. It's better to address the issue before merging, or provide a valid reason to bypass it if fixing isn't possible (e.g., token rate limitations).

@zakisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

zakisk commented Dec 8, 2024

/test

@zakisk zakisk force-pushed the fix-incoming-webhook-name-match branch 2 times, most recently from cc4742c to 099615e Compare December 8, 2024 11:52
@zakisk zakisk requested a review from chmouel December 9, 2024 05:47
fixed an issue in PAC when pipelinerun name is defined via
genetateName field it wasn't matching pipelinrun.

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVKP-6808

Signed-off-by: Zaki Shaikh <zashaikh@redhat.com>
@zakisk zakisk force-pushed the fix-incoming-webhook-name-match branch from 099615e to 27d08ed Compare December 13, 2024 10:27
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.74%. Comparing base (bbd6739) to head (27d08ed).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1855      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.75%   65.74%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         178      178              
  Lines       13839    13836       -3     
==========================================
- Hits         9100     9097       -3     
  Misses       4124     4124              
  Partials      615      615              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chmouel chmouel merged commit d6152a0 into openshift-pipelines:main Dec 13, 2024
7 checks passed
@zakisk zakisk deleted the fix-incoming-webhook-name-match branch January 10, 2025 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants