Skip to content

Conversation

@theakshaypant
Copy link
Contributor

@theakshaypant theakshaypant commented Dec 5, 2025

📝 Description of the Change

Replace global var-naming rule disable with targeted exclusions
for packages that conflict with Go stdlib names: pkg/errors,
pkg/llm/context, pkg/sort, and pkg/test/http. This ensures
the linter remains active for other packages.
Refer #2320 (comment)

👨🏻‍ Linked Jira

N/A

🔗 Linked GitHub Issue

N/A

🚀 Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (fix:)
  • ✨ New feature (feat:)
  • 💥 Breaking change (feat!:, fix!:)
  • 📚 Documentation update (docs:)
  • ⚙️ Chore (chore:)
  • 💅 Refactor (refactor:)
  • 🔧 Enhancement (enhance:)
  • 📦 Dependency update (deps:)

🧪 Testing Strategy

  • Unit tests
  • Integration tests
  • End-to-end tests
  • Manual testing
  • Not Applicable

🤖 AI Assistance

  • I have not used any AI assistance for this PR.
  • I have used AI assistance for this PR.

If you have used AI assistance, please provide the following details:

Which LLM was used?

  • GitHub Copilot
  • ChatGPT (OpenAI)
  • Claude (Anthropic)
  • Cursor
  • Gemini (Google)
  • Other: ____________

Extent of AI Assistance:

  • Documentation and research only
  • Unit tests or E2E tests only
  • Code generation (parts of the code)
  • Full code generation (most of the PR)
  • PR description and comments
  • Commit message(s)

Important

If the majority of the code in this PR was generated by an AI, please add a Co-authored-by trailer to your commit message.
For example:

Co-authored-by: Gemini gemini@google.com
Co-authored-by: ChatGPT noreply@chatgpt.com
Co-authored-by: Claude noreply@anthropic.com
Co-authored-by: Cursor noreply@cursor.com
Co-authored-by: Copilot Copilot@users.noreply.github.com

**💡You can use the script ./hack/add-llm-coauthor.sh to automatically add
these co-author trailers to your commits.

✅ Submitter Checklist

  • 📝 My commit messages are clear, informative, and follow the project's How to write a git commit message guide. The Gitlint linter ensures in CI it's properly validated
  • ✨ I have ensured my commit message prefix (e.g., fix:, feat:) matches the "Type of Change" I selected above.
  • ♽ I have run make test and make lint locally to check for and fix any
    issues. For an efficient workflow, I have considered installing
    pre-commit and running pre-commit install to
    automate these checks.
  • 📖 I have added or updated documentation for any user-facing changes.
  • 🧪 I have added sufficient unit tests for my code changes.
  • 🎁 I have added end-to-end tests where feasible. See README for more details.
  • 🔎 I have addressed any CI test flakiness or provided a clear reason to bypass it.
  • If adding a provider feature, I have filled in the following and updated the provider documentation:
    • GitHub App
    • GitHub Webhook
    • Gitea/Forgejo
    • GitLab
    • Bitbucket Cloud
    • Bitbucket Data Center

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @theakshaypant, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a configuration change to the project's linting setup. Specifically, it disables a variable naming rule within the revive linter to prevent conflicts that occur when package names coincide with standard library names. This adjustment aims to streamline the linting process by eliminating false positives and ensuring that the linter focuses on more relevant code quality issues.

Highlights

  • Linter Configuration Update: The revive linter's var-naming rule has been explicitly disabled in the .golangci.yml configuration.
  • Conflict Resolution: This change addresses and resolves conflicts that arise when package names inadvertently match standard library names, preventing unnecessary linter warnings.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@pipelines-as-code
Copy link

pipelines-as-code bot commented Dec 5, 2025

🔍 PR Lint Feedback

Note: This automated check helps ensure your PR follows our contribution guidelines.

⚠️ Items that need attention:

🎫 Jira reference

Add a Jira reference in the description using one of the following formats:

  • https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVKP-<number>

If no SRVKP ticket exists yet, link a GitHub issue instead (e.g., Fixes #123).
Minor housekeeping PRs without Jira coverage can skip this after confirming with reviewers.


🤖 AI attribution

The following commits lack an explicit AI attribution footer:

  • e93bf3a chore(lint): scope revive var-naming exclusion to specific packages

If no AI assistance was used for a commit, you can ignore this warning.
Otherwise add an Assisted-by: or Co-authored-by: footer referencing the AI used.


ℹ️ Next Steps

  • Review and address the items above
  • Push new commits to update this PR
  • This comment will be automatically updated when issues are resolved
🔧 Admin Tools (click to expand)

Automated Issue/Ticket Creation:

  • /issue-create - Generate a GitHub issue from this PR content using AI
  • /jira-create - Create a SRVKP Jira ticket from this PR content using AI

⚠️ Important: Always review and edit generated content before finalizing tickets/issues.
The AI-generated content should be used as a starting point and may need adjustments.

These commands are available to maintainers and will post the generated content as PR comments for review.

🤖 This feedback was generated automatically by the PR CI system

@pipelines-as-code pipelines-as-code bot added the go Pull requests that update Go code label Dec 5, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request disables the revive linter's var-naming rule to avoid conflicts with stdlib package names. While this solves the immediate problem, a more targeted approach would be to configure an allow-list for the rule instead of disabling it entirely. This would preserve the rule's benefits for the rest of the codebase while addressing the specific conflicts. I've added a suggestion to implement this more targeted fix.

Replace global var-naming rule disable with targeted exclusions
for packages that conflict with Go stdlib names: pkg/errors,
pkg/llm/context, pkg/sort, and pkg/test/http.

Signed-off-by: Akshay Pant <akshay.akshaypant@gmail.com>
@theakshaypant theakshaypant force-pushed the fix-golangci-revive-var-naming branch from f8727e2 to e93bf3a Compare December 5, 2025 08:05
@theakshaypant theakshaypant changed the title chore: disable revive var-naming rule in golangci chore(lint): scope revive var-naming exclusion to specific packages Dec 5, 2025
@zakisk zakisk merged commit 4d75ddc into openshift-pipelines:main Dec 8, 2025
2 checks passed
@theakshaypant theakshaypant deleted the fix-golangci-revive-var-naming branch December 8, 2025 05:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

go Pull requests that update Go code testing

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants