-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 337
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-43707: Add crd override for NodePool scale subresource #4970
OCPBUGS-43707: Add crd override for NodePool scale subresource #4970
Conversation
While this should be generated by the tooling/marker, it's not atm openshift/api#2075. This fixes the regression while the tooling is fixed
@enxebre: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43707, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: enxebre The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/jira refresh |
@enxebre: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43707, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/override "Red Hat Konflux / hypershift-operator-main-on-pull-request" |
@enxebre: Overrode contexts on behalf of enxebre: Red Hat Konflux / hypershift-operator-main-on-pull-request In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@enxebre: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
d29e8a1
into
openshift:main
@enxebre: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43707: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43707 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
While this should be generated by the tooling/marker, it's not atm openshift/api#2075. This fixes the regression while the tooling is fixed
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, use
fixes #<issue_number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, where issue_number might be a GitHub issue, or a Jira story:Fixes #
Checklist