test(carousel): add ui-test #54
Conversation
WalkthroughA new test file, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
tests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts (9)
4-12: LGTM: Well-structured test for basic usage.The test case effectively covers the basic functionality of the carousel component. It includes error handling, interaction, visibility check, and screenshot capture for visual regression testing.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of clicking the second button (index 1) in line 9. This would improve the test's readability and maintainability.
13-22: LGTM: Good test for arrow visibility, with room for improvement.The test case effectively covers the arrow visibility functionality of the carousel component. It includes error handling, interaction, visibility check, and screenshot capture for visual regression testing.
- Consider translating the Chinese comment on line 17 to English for better international collaboration.
- The test name mentions "left and right arrows", but the test only interacts with the first arrow (presumably the left one). Consider adding an interaction with the right arrow as well for more comprehensive coverage.
23-30: LGTM: Good visual test for arrow disabled state, but could be more comprehensive.The test case covers the visual aspect of the arrow disabled state in the carousel component. It includes error handling, visibility check, and screenshot capture for visual regression testing.
Consider enhancing this test to verify the functional aspect of the disabled state:
- Add an interaction attempt with the disabled arrow.
- Assert that the carousel state doesn't change after the interaction attempt.
This would provide a more comprehensive test of the disabled state functionality.
31-38: LGTM: Good visual test for vertical carousel, but interaction could be added.The test case effectively covers the visual aspect of the vertical carousel. It includes error handling, visibility check, and screenshot capture for visual regression testing.
To make this test more robust:
- Add an interaction to trigger vertical scrolling (e.g., click on navigation dots or arrows).
- Capture another screenshot after the interaction.
- Compare the two screenshots to ensure the carousel has scrolled vertically.
This would provide a more comprehensive test of the vertical carousel functionality.
39-46: LGTM: Good visual test for title display, but could be more specific.The test case covers the visual aspect of the title display in the carousel component. It includes error handling, visibility check, and screenshot capture for visual regression testing.
To enhance this test:
- Add a specific check for the presence of the title element.
- Verify the content of the title matches the expected text.
Example:
const title = carousel.locator('.carousel-title'); await expect(title).toBeVisible(); await expect(title).toHaveText('Expected Title Text');This would provide a more targeted test of the title display functionality.
47-54: LGTM: Good visual test for card mode, but interaction could be added.The test case effectively covers the visual aspect of the card mode in the carousel component. It includes error handling, visibility check, and screenshot capture for visual regression testing.
To make this test more comprehensive:
- Add an interaction to navigate between cards (e.g., click on next/previous buttons or swipe).
- Verify that the active card changes after the interaction.
- Capture another screenshot after the interaction to ensure the card transition is visually correct.
Example:
await carousel.locator('.next-button').click(); await expect(carousel.locator('.card.active')).toHaveAttribute('data-index', '1'); await expect(carousel).toHaveScreenshot('card-mode-after-transition.png');This would provide a more thorough test of the card mode functionality.
55-62: LGTM: Good visual test for slot mode, but could be more specific.The test case covers the visual aspect of the slot mode in the carousel component. It includes error handling, visibility check, and screenshot capture for visual regression testing.
To enhance this test:
- Add specific checks for the presence of slot elements.
- Verify the content of the slots matches the expected structure or text.
Example:
const slotContent = carousel.locator('.slot-content'); await expect(slotContent).toBeVisible(); await expect(slotContent).toContainText('Expected Slot Text');This would provide a more targeted test of the slot mode functionality and ensure that the slots are correctly rendered with the expected content.
63-71: LGTM: Good test for dialog mode, with room for improvement.The test case effectively covers the opening of the carousel in dialog mode. It includes error handling, interaction to open the dialog, visibility check, and screenshot capture for visual regression testing.
To make this test more comprehensive:
- Add a check to ensure the dialog is actually open (e.g., verify the presence of an overlay or dialog-specific class).
- Include an interaction with the carousel within the dialog (e.g., navigate to the next slide).
- Add a step to close the dialog and verify it's no longer visible.
Example:
await expect(page.locator('.dialog-overlay')).toBeVisible(); await carousel.locator('.next-button').click(); await expect(carousel.locator('.slide.active')).toHaveAttribute('data-index', '1'); await page.locator('.close-dialog-button').click(); await expect(page.locator('.dialog-overlay')).not.toBeVisible();This would provide a more thorough test of the dialog mode functionality, covering opening, interaction, and closing of the dialog.
1-72: Overall: Well-structured test suite with room for enhancement.This test suite provides comprehensive coverage of the carousel component's various modes and features. The consistent approach to error handling and screenshot capturing is commendable.
To further improve the test suite:
Consider adding more specific assertions in addition to screenshot comparisons. This will help pinpoint issues more precisely if a test fails.
Implement more interactions within each test case to verify dynamic behaviors, not just static appearances.
Translate all comments to English for better international collaboration.
Consider extracting common setup steps (like navigation and error handling) into helper functions or hooks to reduce repetition and improve maintainability.
Add tests for edge cases and error scenarios, such as trying to navigate beyond the last slide or handling network errors when loading images.
Consider adding accessibility tests to ensure the carousel is usable with keyboard navigation and screen readers.
These enhancements will make the test suite more robust and comprehensive, ensuring better quality and reliability of the carousel component.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (8)
tests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/basic-usage-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/card-mode-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/card-show-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/carousel-arrow-always-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/close-loop-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/dialog-card-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/show-title-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/up-down-carousel-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/carousel/xdesign.spec.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM: Imports are correct and necessary.The import statement is appropriate for Playwright tests, importing only the necessary functions.
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit