Fix intermediate raster format #230
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is for fixing the SAS failure reported by the SDS team in November 2024. The reason for the failure was because in rare case GDAL did not recognize the intermediate raster files written in ENVI format. The fix was to change their format from ENVI to Geotiff.
The change was tested by processing the two cases of triaged dataset from PGE, which were successful. Also the old CSLC products were re-processed with the fixed COMPASS, and they are compared by using validate_product.py. The comparison did not catch any differences between them.
The increase of the speed was also tested. A slight increase in the processing time was noticed.
Burst CSLC:
Static layer: