Skip to content

Conversation

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title Update OCP Catalog index from 4.20 to 4.21 OPRUN-4204: Update OCP Catalog index from 4.20 to 4.21 Oct 15, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 15, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4204 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 15, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: grokspawn

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 15, 2025
@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

grokspawn commented Oct 15, 2025

FWIW, I have a script that downloads the catalogs[1], and have verified that the catalog contents are non-zero and well-formed[2].

[1] https://gist.github.com/grokspawn/a6260916723188cb5596c6bf31f3dc81
[2]

$ catalogs_updater.sh
catalogs for 4.21
rendering certified-operator-index:v4.21 to certified-operator-index-v4.21.yaml
rendering redhat-operator-index:v4.21 to redhat-operator-index-v4.21.yaml
rendering redhat-marketplace-index:v4.21 to redhat-marketplace-index-v4.21.yaml
rendering community-operator-index:v4.21 to community-operator-index-v4.21.yaml

$ echo $?
0

$ find ~/devel/catalogs/ -type d -name 4.21 -exec ls -all {} \;
total 8200
drwxr-xr-x  3 jordan staff      96 Oct 14 08:55 .
drwxr-xr-x 12 jordan staff     384 Oct 14 08:55 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 jordan staff 7678625 Oct 15 13:33 certified-operator-index-v4.21.yaml
total 48160
drwxr-xr-x  3 jordan staff       96 Oct 14 08:55 .
drwxr-xr-x 12 jordan staff      384 Oct 14 08:55 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 jordan staff 48837739 Oct 15 13:34 redhat-operator-index-v4.21.yaml
total 6176
drwxr-xr-x  3 jordan staff      96 Oct 14 08:55 .
drwxr-xr-x 12 jordan staff     384 Oct 14 08:55 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 jordan staff 5896149 Oct 15 13:33 redhat-marketplace-index-v4.21.yaml
total 17412
drwxr-xr-x  3 jordan staff       96 Oct 14 08:55 .
drwxr-xr-x 12 jordan staff      384 Oct 14 08:55 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 jordan staff 16961536 Oct 15 13:33 community-operator-index-v4.21.yaml

@bandrade
Copy link

/label qe-approved
/verified by @bandrade

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Oct 15, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@bandrade: This PR has been marked as verified by @bandrade.

In response to this:

/label qe-approved
/verified by @bandrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4204 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-olm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2025

@camilamacedo86: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-gcp-console-olm
/test e2e-gcp-operator
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test images
/test okd-scos-images
/test unit
/test verify-deps

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test e2e-gcp-olm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-olm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2025

@camilamacedo86: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-gcp-console-olm
/test e2e-gcp-operator
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test images
/test okd-scos-images
/test unit
/test verify-deps

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test e2e-gcp-olm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

6 similar comments
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Oct 22, 2025

/test e2e-gcp

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

4 similar comments
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Oct 27, 2025

/retest-required

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Oct 27, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 27, 2025
@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

/verified by @bandrade

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jianzhangbjz: This PR has been marked as verified by @bandrade.

In response to this:

/verified by @bandrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Oct 28, 2025

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

This 4.21 index image lacks some operator packages lead to this ci/prow/e2e-gcp failure. Details on Slack: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C06KP34REFJ/p1761726159992919?thread_ts=1761696374.888149&cid=C06KP34REFJ
image

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

Just to get the latest state and we work from there.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

It seems that one of the tests are satisfied so before start to look on change the test
lets ensure that the content was not shipped so far

/retest-required

Just to get the latest state and we work from there.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

Latest issue changed

Screenshot 2025-10-31 at 17 57 14

/retest-required

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

The PR: openshift/origin#30450 should solve the issue : [sig-operator] an end user can use OLM can subscribe to the operator [apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

We need get it openshift/origin#30450 merged.
Then: rerun the test here and see if we are still facing the same issues as well.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 5, 2025

@camilamacedo86: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn c633666 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp c633666 link true /test e2e-gcp

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

camilamacedo86 commented Nov 5, 2025

We’re handling two scenarios to fix the ci:

Our own tests: We spoke with the maintainer, and they plan to publish the operator within 2 weeks. We also have a PR ready to modify the test if needed, using an alternative solution. More info:
https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C3VS0LV41/p1762185826980199,
https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C09EPHWT0NM/p1762264132594909?thread_ts=1762252239.152429&cid=C09EPHWT0NM

Tests not managed by us: This involves two other teams.
We’ve already reached out to them and are waiting for their responses.
More info: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C3VS0LV41/p1762301447598429

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR verified

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants