[Feature Request]: Add instructions to the wiki for how to assign a reviewer. #5073
Assignees
Labels
enhancement
End user-perceivable enhancements.
Impact: Low
Low perceived user impact (e.g. edge cases).
Work: Low
Solution is clear and broken into good-first-issue-sized chunks.
Comments
seanlip
added
enhancement
MohitGupta121
added
Impact: Low
6 tasks
adhiamboperes
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2023
…ntation (#5174) <!-- READ ME FIRST: Please fill in the explanation section below and check off every point from the Essential Checklist! --> ## Explanation Fix #5073: Add instructions to the wiki for how to assign a reviewer. Fix #5062: Add wiki documentation for how to pick the emulator/android version when running Espresso tests. Fix #5099: Reorganize the Project Setup Documentation Fix part of #1723: ensure the onboarding flow leads into follow-up documentation: architecture overview, code style, submission guidelines, how to make UX changes, how to contribute large projects (which should tie into design documents), and best practices Fix part of #1723: Known issues that have come up in discussions ## Essential Checklist <!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. --> - [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [x] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [x] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The wiki page https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section explains what to do when sending a PR for review. However, new contributors don't have permissions to update the assignee fields in GitHub, so the instructions aren't followable as-is.
Describe the solution you'd like
Explain, in that section, how to add assignees in such cases (e.g. explaining how to leave a comment like "@Reviewer PTAL" so that Oppiabot assigns the reviewer for them).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: