-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
Fix backwards-compatibility issue introduced with PR#59/#60 #67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
lukaszlenart
merged 1 commit into
orphan-oss:ognl-3-1-x
from
JCgH4164838Gh792C124B5:localOGNL_3_1B1
Jan 25, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why change this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @aleksandr-m .
It was just a minor optimization (equivalent to one already used in
OgnlRuntime
) to replace two calls tof.getModifiers()
:.. if (!Modifier.isStatic(f.getModifiers())) / result = Modifier.isFinal(f.getModifiers());
with a single call/assignment for the field modifiers
fModifiers = f.getModifiers()
:.. if (!Modifier.isStatic(fModifiers)) / result = Modifier.isFinal(fModifiers).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
getModifiers()
is just a getter it is ok to use it directly. If you want to keepfModifiers
then declaration and assignment can be moved to the same line, currently it looks very odd.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @aleksandr-m .
Thanks for the feed-back and suggestion.
The declaration/assignment for
fModifiers
has been moved to the same line in both modules (and the declaration of one variable moved closer to its usage point). Hopefully it looks a little cleaner now ?