Skip to content

Propose adding a tentative addition #246

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 21, 2023
Merged

Propose adding a tentative addition #246

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 21, 2023

Conversation

david-a-wheeler
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
@david-a-wheeler
Copy link
Contributor Author

I do tentative additions and find them helpful, especially for discovering unnecessary indirect dependencies. I suggest others do the same.

Thoughts?

@david-a-wheeler
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SecurityCRob - maybe this could proposal could be mentioned in a BEST WG meeting? I think voting for approval seems like the cleanest way to add a whole new proposed item.

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
As noted in
[CommonMark list-items](https://spec.commonmark.org/0.30/#list-items),
"The most important thing to notice is that the position of the text
after the list marker determines how much indentation is needed in
subsequent blocks in the list item. If the list marker takes up two
spaces of indentation, and there are three spaces between the list
marker and the next character other than a space or tab, then blocks
must be indented five spaces in order to fall under the list item."

This means that renumbering an item may require indentation changes
to match.

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
@david-a-wheeler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note: the only real addition is a new point 9.

The old point 9 is renumbered to point 10. Markdown lists must align to the text after the number, so the sub-bullets must all get 1 extra space at the beginning. So this change looks larger than it really is.

Copy link
Contributor

@SecurityCRob SecurityCRob left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@balteravishay
Copy link
Contributor

+1 looks good!

@david-a-wheeler david-a-wheeler merged commit c1f870c into main Nov 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants