-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 162
Propose adding a tentative addition #246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
I do tentative additions and find them helpful, especially for discovering unnecessary indirect dependencies. I suggest others do the same. Thoughts? |
@SecurityCRob - maybe this could proposal could be mentioned in a BEST WG meeting? I think voting for approval seems like the cleanest way to add a whole new proposed item. |
Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
As noted in [CommonMark list-items](https://spec.commonmark.org/0.30/#list-items), "The most important thing to notice is that the position of the text after the list marker determines how much indentation is needed in subsequent blocks in the list item. If the list marker takes up two spaces of indentation, and there are three spaces between the list marker and the next character other than a space or tab, then blocks must be indented five spaces in order to fall under the list item." This means that renumbering an item may require indentation changes to match. Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>
Note: the only real addition is a new point 9. The old point 9 is renumbered to point 10. Markdown lists must align to the text after the number, so the sub-bullets must all get 1 extra space at the beginning. So this change looks larger than it really is. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
+1 looks good! |
No description provided.