-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Proposals] Vote result / deposit result #74
Comments
@mitchellchou would like to double confirm delegated validators are always at the top of the list? have we confirmed how the validators should be sorted yet? |
|
@mitchellchou forgot to ask if the delegated validators are part of the pagination? so if I have 7 delegated validators then first page: 5 delegated validators |
@hochiw LGTM🙏 |
sad |
Moniker and securitycontact comes from rpc/bdjuno and avatar comes from bdjuno/keybase
This should be an issue as I can see moniker present for the validators in db
It's a bit awkward here since we get validator from bdjuno for this page but from rpc for the other pages
I think we can display avatar here first, but would the design be similar to Your stake? as the original design doesn't have avatar displayed
Unfortunately most of the validators don't have their security contact filled in so this button is highly unlikely to be displayed, but it's implemented. |
@hochiw oh my bad, no need avatar here |
It seems like this has the same issue as mainnet Validator description info wasn't inserted to the database likely due to the state being pruned, as I was able to see the moniker for those whose validator description is present on the db I tried running bdjuno locally on testnet and watched until the height when Faseng/Chima were created: block 309 and I got this
further testing on cli got me this
|
Seems I missed this, will handle |
Maybe let me append the description data to the db manually since there aren't too many |
nvm there are 28 validators without basic information |
@mitchellchou would it be better to show a tooltip here |
Will move back to Inbox after remind to vote tooltip is merged as moniker is blocked by bdjuno issue |
As a dao participant, I want to know what's the current or final results of a proposal and who and how others participated so that I can have sufficient info to make any decision (e.g. stake in someone)
Acceptance criteria
Positive
Negative
Contact information for this validator is not available
General
Screen behaviors
General
Votes tab
Deposit tab
Content
Votes tab
Threshold
(not in the figms but should have)Not voted yet
Deposit tab
Not deposited yet
Sorting
UI
Figma
Ref
x/group
will allow groups to set their own decision policy (e.g. it may have a different Quorum compared to the whole community), this may need to be considered when designing the APIThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: