-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
MULTIARCH-5369: Implement logic in the pod reconciler to work with the namespace-scoped PPC #676
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
AnnaZivkovic
wants to merge
4
commits into
outrigger-project:main
Choose a base branch
from
AnnaZivkovic:pod-reconciler-add-PodPlacementConfig
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1479575
MULTIARCH-5369: Implement logic in the pod reconciler to work with th…
AnnaZivkovic 4a6c5e1
MULTIARCH-5369: Add tests
AnnaZivkovic 1066c67
MULTIARCH-5369 Improve transparency for PreferredDuringSchedulingIgno…
AnnaZivkovic 0b86c94
MULTIARCH-5369: adding tests for updated labels
AnnaZivkovic File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @AnnaZivkovic, Why are we removing this check? Should we ignore Pods if the user has already set a Preferred Affinity for architecture?
If the intention is to cover both local PPC and CPPC, could we introduce a third option to distinguish whether the Preferred Affinity was user-defined or modified by our code? For example, we might rely on the label
multiarch.openshift.io/preferred-node-affinity—treat Pods without this label(ornot-set) or with the valuesetdifferently.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lwan-wanglin that is a good idea! ill add a value to notate how the label got set.
This check will need to be removed or modified because it can not find the difference between having the preferred node affinity setp with the CPPC or the PPC. With the original check it would not check the CPPC preferred affinity if the PPC set anything. Tho I think removing it is the wrong move now. Ill give it a more fine grained approach