Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

⚡ Bolt: Optimize work listing performance

💡 What: Replaced external process spawns (basename, sed, grep) with bash builtins in the list_work loop.
🎯 Why: Spawning processes in a loop causes O(N) performance degradation. Listing 50 work items took >0.5s.
📊 Impact: ~43x speedup (562ms -> 13ms for 50 items).
🔬 Measurement: Validated with reproduction script benchmarking loop performance. Verified correctness with existing tests.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12001819725399991506 started by @oyi77

…ary of the changes:

- Replaced `basename` with parameter expansion `${path##*/}`
- Replaced `sed` with bash regex `[[ =~ ]]` for date stripping
- Replaced the search and filter pipeline with a `read` loop for proposal title extraction
- Fixed unbound variable `filter` in `list_work`

These changes reduce the execution time for listing 50 items from ~560ms to ~13ms, achieving a ~43x speedup.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants