Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ’‘ What: Optimized list_work function in lib/internal/work_manager.sh to use bash builtins instead of spawning external processes (basename, sed, grep) inside the loop. Also fixed a test isolation issue in tests/integration/test_workflow.bats.

🎯 Why: Listing work items was slow due to spawning 4 processes per item. For 50 items, this meant 200 process forks.

πŸ“Š Impact:

  • Time: Reduced from 0.843s to 0.008s for 50 items (~100x faster).
  • Resources: Significantly reduced CPU overhead from process forking.

πŸ”¬ Measurement:

  • time list_work with 50 items.
  • Run bats tests/integration/test_workflow.bats to ensure correctness.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 11421419893823680587 started by @oyi77

Optimization:
- Replaced `basename` with bash parameter expansion `${work_path##*/}`.
- Replaced `echo | sed` for date prefix removal with bash regex match `[[ =~ ]]`.
- Replaced the text matching and `sed` pipeline for description extraction with a `while read` loop and parameter expansion.
- Fixed potential unbound variable error for `list_work` argument.

Impact:
- Reduces execution time for listing 50 work items from ~0.843s to ~0.008s (~100x speedup).
- Eliminates ~200 external process spawns for 50 items.

Verification:
- Benchmarked with `benchmark_list_work.sh`.
- Verified with `tests/integration/test_workflow.bats` (fixed test isolation issue).
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants