Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[nomination-pools] Backport of #4503. Fix pools with extra consumer ref to be destroyed. #4524

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2024

Commits on May 20, 2024

  1. Allow pool to be destroyed with an extra (erroneous) consumer referen…

    …ce on the pool account (#4503)
    
    addresses #4440 (will
    close once we have this in prod runtimes).
    related: #2037.
    
    An extra consumer reference is preventing pools to be destroyed. When a
    pool is ready to be destroyed, we
    can safely clear the consumer references if any. Notably, I only check
    for one extra consumer reference since that is a known bug. Anything
    more indicates possibly another issue and we probably don't want to
    silently absorb those errors as well.
    
    After this change, pools with extra consumer reference should be able to
    destroy normally.
    Ank4n committed May 20, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    3f5b01b View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history