Prefetch check #133
Merged
Prefetch check #133
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
khoroshevskyi
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed in #130 here is my idea for checking if
prefetchis installed and on the path. It doesn't requirecommandorwhereto be installed. I tested on Windows and Linux.Note I started this PR from the as-yet-unreleased V_0_12_6 branch therefore it shows quite a few diffs compared to master. The only file I changed was geofetch.py.
Please can you have a check and see if it looks suitable?
Thanks.