Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[StepSecurity] Apply security best practices #71

Conversation

step-security-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This pull request is created by Secure Repo at the request of @pfichtner. Please merge the Pull Request to incorporate the requested changes. Please tag @pfichtner on your message if you have any questions related to the PR. You can also engage with the StepSecurity team by tagging @step-security-bot.

Security Fixes

Least Privileged GitHub Actions Token Permissions

The GITHUB_TOKEN is an automatically generated secret to make authenticated calls to the GitHub API. GitHub recommends setting minimum token permissions for the GITHUB_TOKEN.

Pinned Dependencies

GitHub Action tags and Docker tags are mutatble. This poses a security risk. GitHub's Security Hardening guide recommends pinning actions to full length commit.

Harden Runner

Harden-Runner is an open-source security agent for the GitHub-hosted runner to prevent software supply chain attacks. It prevents exfiltration of credentials, detects tampering of source code during build, and enables running jobs without sudo access.

Harden runner usage

You can find link to view insights and policy recommendation in the build log

Please refer to documentation to find more details.

Detect Vulnerabilities with SAST Workflow

Static Code Analysis (also known as Source Code Analysis) is usually performed as part of a Code Review (also known as clear-box testing) and is carried out at the Implementation phase of a Security Development Lifecycle (SDL). Static Code Analysis commonly refers to the running of Static Code Analysis tools that attempt to highlight possible vulnerabilities within ‘static’ (non-running) source code by using techniques such as Taint Analysis and Data Flow Analysis.

Add Dependency Review Workflow

The Dependency Review Workflow enforces dependency reviews on your pull requests. The action scans for vulnerable versions of dependencies introduced by package version changes in pull requests, and warns you about the associated security vulnerabilities. This gives you better visibility of what's changing in a pull request, and helps prevent vulnerabilities being added to your repository.

Add OpenSSF Scorecard Workflow

OpenSSF Scorecard is an automated tool that assesses a number of important heuristics ("checks") associated with software security and assigns each check a score of 0-10. You can use these scores to understand specific areas to improve in order to strengthen the security posture of your project.

Scorecard workflow also allows maintainers to display a Scorecard badge on their repository to show off their hard work.

Feedback

For bug reports, feature requests, and general feedback; please create an issue in step-security/secure-repo. To create such PRs, please visit https://app.stepsecurity.io/securerepo.

Signed-off-by: StepSecurity Bot bot@stepsecurity.io

Signed-off-by: StepSecurity Bot <bot@stepsecurity.io>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (91ac603) 89.28% compared to head (6dd1dcd) 89.28%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main      #71   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     89.28%   89.28%           
  Complexity      191      191           
=========================================
  Files            23       23           
  Lines           392      392           
  Branches         41       41           
=========================================
  Hits            350      350           
  Misses           20       20           
  Partials         22       22           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pfichtner pfichtner merged commit 645fcfa into pfichtner:main Oct 7, 2023
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants