-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
10-1_Update #1618
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
10-1_Update #1618
Conversation
…o two rules, 10-15 was also created which checks that if humidification was specified in the proposed that it was also modeled in the baseline.
- Case 3: Else if the baseline zone is not modeled with humidification when the proposed zone has humidficiation: `elif has_humidification_b == FALSE and has_humidification_p == TRUE: outcome == "FAIL"` | ||
- Case 4: Else, humidification not modeled for the zone in proposed or baseline: `Else: outcome == "INAPPLICABLE"` | ||
|
||
- Case 1: If the zone was modeled with humidification in the baseline and proposed then UNDETERMINED to check that the correct type of humidification was modeled (provide the zone_p.id and zone_b.id and the humidification_type_b in the output): `if has_humidification_b == TRUE and has_humidification_p == TRUE: outcome == "UNDETERMINED" and raise_message "This zone is modeled with humidification in the baseline and proposed. Check that the baseline system serving this zone is modeled with adiabatic humidification if the specified humidification system complies with 90.1 - 2019 Section 6.5.2.4, and that the baseline system serving this zone is modeled with non-adiabatic humidification if the specified system does not comply with Section 6.5.2.4."` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what if the proposed is modeled with humidification and the baseline is not? This would be an undetermined / Fail case, right?
Same for the case where the baseline has humidification an the proposed does not.
EDIT: Nevermind. This is covered in 10-15 - might want to add a note to clarify where these cases are covered.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have a suggested note? I am not sure this is needed since the logic aligns with the wording of the rule.
Updated to have an undetermined and not_applicable outcome. Split into two rules, 10-15 was also created which checks that if humidification was specified in the proposed that it was also modeled in the baseline.