Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fix: prevent over-scoped text edits from silently deleting content #466
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
fix: prevent over-scoped text edits from silently deleting content #466
Changes from all commits
a732886File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
Check notice on line 90 in npm/src/agent/shared/prompts.js
architecture Issue
Raw output
Check warning on line 451 in npm/src/tools/edit.js
style Issue
Raw output
Check notice on line 451 in npm/src/tools/edit.js
logic Issue
Raw output
Check notice on line 451 in npm/src/tools/edit.js
architecture Issue
Raw output
Check warning on line 457 in npm/src/tools/edit.js
architecture Issue
Raw output
Check notice on line 458 in npm/src/tools/edit.js
architecture Issue
Raw output
Consider extracting the validation into a dedicated function like `validateEditScope(oldLines, newLines)` that returns `{ valid: boolean, reason?: string }`. This would make the validation logic reusable, testable in isolation, and consistent with other validation patterns in the file.Check notice on line 187 in npm/tests/unit/edit-create-tools.test.js
logic Issue
Raw output
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.