-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
Add cluster name to the ordering to make sure that the data types always return in the same order every time for matter #1645
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @brdandu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request aims to resolve an issue where data types might not consistently return in the same order, particularly in contexts related to "matter" (likely a reference to the Matter smart home standard). By enhancing the database queries to sort data types not only by their name but also by their associated cluster name, the changes ensure a stable and predictable order of results, improving reliability for dependent operations.
Highlights
- Data Type Ordering Stability: Implemented changes across multiple database queries to ensure consistent and deterministic ordering of data types by incorporating the associated cluster name into the sorting criteria.
- Database Query Enhancements: Updated SQL queries for bitmap, enum, number, string, and struct data types to include LEFT JOIN operations with DATA_TYPE_CLUSTER and CLUSTER tables, enabling sorting by CLUSTER.NAME in addition to DATA_TYPE.NAME.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to ensure a deterministic order for data type queries by adding the cluster name to the ORDER BY
clause. The changes are consistently applied across several query files by joining DATA_TYPE_CLUSTER
and CLUSTER
tables. While reviewing, I noticed that in query-bitmap.js
, the PACKAGE_REF
column in the WHERE
clause is ambiguous, unlike the other updated queries where it's properly qualified. I've added a suggestion to fix this for consistency and to prevent potential bugs.
932d12d
to
0974b11
Compare
…lways return in the same order every time for matter - Adding unit tests for deterministic order of data types - Handling the null clusters references appropriately as well - Ordering with a select query in order by for data types in order to get the data types in a deterministic order every time using the data type name and the cluster name it belongs too - Gihub: ZAP project-chip#1596
2a92723
to
ce36a02
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally, functionality is fine.
I do have grave concerns about performance. Adding an INNER JOIN to the ORDER BY clause is very taxing on the performance of the SQLite, so we are slowly digging ourselves into the ground with this.... :(
Github: ZAP #1596