Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: use renovate instead of dependabot #1261

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

oliverbaehler
Copy link
Collaborator

I would like to switch to renovate, the given configuration already adheres to our semantic commits, in addition it will do the following:

  • Group all github-action updates into one pr
  • Group all minor and patch updates into one pr

For the rest there will be dedicated prs, specifically for this repo:

  • helm dependency (capsule-proxy)
  • go major bumps (i think commit digests are also considered majors)

Renovate offers much more in respect of simplifying the prs and the ecosystem which is supported. Therefor im proposing the use of renovate and the removal of dependabot.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Deploy Preview for capsule-documentation canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 15aa4ef
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/capsule-documentation/deploys/674348d1edef130008565ba7

Signed-off-by: Oliver Bähler <oliverbaehler@hotmail.com>
@oliverbaehler oliverbaehler changed the title feat(git): use renovate instead of dependabot feat: use renovate instead of dependabot Nov 24, 2024
@prometherion
Copy link
Member

prometherion commented Nov 25, 2024

I don't have a strong opinion on this, let's ping other maintainers @bsctl @MaxFedotov @maxgio92

@maxgio92
Copy link
Collaborator

I've just left some comments. I'm ok for it :)
+1

@oliverbaehler oliverbaehler merged commit 59cb969 into projectcapsule:main Dec 4, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants