Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove disabled ingress-conformance run from CI #6032

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

skriss
Copy link
Member

@skriss skriss commented Dec 20, 2023

Upstream Ingress conformance is flaky/poorly maintained and
unlikely to reach a state where it can reliably be run in CI.

Signed-off-by: Steve Kriss <stephen.kriss@gmail.com>
@skriss skriss added the release-note/none-required Marks a PR as not requiring a release note. Should only be used for very small changes. label Dec 20, 2023
@skriss skriss requested a review from a team as a code owner December 20, 2023 16:40
@skriss skriss requested review from stevesloka and sunjayBhatia and removed request for a team December 20, 2023 16:40
@sunjayBhatia sunjayBhatia requested review from a team, davinci26 and clayton-gonsalves and removed request for a team December 20, 2023 16:41
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (00dc280) 78.68% compared to head (ea3d4a2) 78.70%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6032      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.68%   78.70%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         138      138              
  Lines       19675    19717      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits        15481    15518      +37     
- Misses       3890     3895       +5     
  Partials      304      304              

see 11 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@sunjayBhatia sunjayBhatia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

We might just remove the ingress conformance tests from the pipelines too tbh and just leave the makefile task to run them manually

no-one really reviews changes to the repo and since theyre so flaky (no retries/timeouts configurable on http requests) i dont think anyone is actually running them in CI

@skriss
Copy link
Member Author

skriss commented Dec 20, 2023

LGTM

We might just remove the ingress conformance tests from the pipelines too tbh and just leave the makefile task to run them manually

no-one really reviews changes to the repo and since theyre so flaky (no retries/timeouts configurable on http requests) i dont think anyone is actually running them in CI

SGTM, let me make that change here

Signed-off-by: Steve Kriss <stephen.kriss@gmail.com>
@skriss skriss changed the title disabled unused sonobuoy download remove disabled ingress-conformance run from CI Dec 20, 2023
@skriss skriss enabled auto-merge (squash) December 20, 2023 17:53
@skriss skriss merged commit a579ec3 into projectcontour:main Dec 20, 2023
26 checks passed
@skriss skriss deleted the pr-disable-sonobuoy-download branch December 20, 2023 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note/none-required Marks a PR as not requiring a release note. Should only be used for very small changes.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants