Skip to content

Use graph_replace instead of clone_replace in VI

Codecov / codecov/project failed Jul 27, 2023 in 0s

72.90% (-19.15%) compared to e3961fc

View this Pull Request on Codecov

72.90% (-19.15%) compared to e3961fc

Details

Codecov Report

Merging #6830 (d97d587) into main (e3961fc) will decrease coverage by 19.15%.
The diff coverage is 62.50%.

❗ Current head d97d587 differs from pull request most recent head d518259. Consider uploading reports for the commit d518259 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6830       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   92.05%   72.90%   -19.15%     
===========================================
  Files          96       96               
  Lines       16373    16375        +2     
===========================================
- Hits        15072    11939     -3133     
- Misses       1301     4436     +3135     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
pymc/pytensorf.py 73.13% <ø> (-19.63%) ⬇️
pymc/variational/opvi.py 36.66% <11.76%> (-50.82%) ⬇️
pymc/logprob/mixture.py 23.68% <42.85%> (-73.22%) ⬇️
pymc/variational/approximations.py 44.14% <50.00%> (-46.36%) ⬇️
pymc/variational/stein.py 47.54% <50.00%> (-52.46%) ⬇️
pymc/distributions/distribution.py 73.34% <100.00%> (-23.72%) ⬇️
pymc/distributions/multivariate.py 91.89% <100.00%> (-0.33%) ⬇️
pymc/gp/cov.py 98.00% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
pymc/math.py 52.23% <100.00%> (-18.38%) ⬇️
pymc/model_graph.py 80.43% <100.00%> (+0.32%) ⬆️

... and 54 files with indirect coverage changes