-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Universal Strict Lifting (Hypergraph to Combinatorial) #47
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Hello @alvarolmartinez! Thank you for your submission. As we near the end of the challenge, I am collecting participant info for the purpose of selecting and announcing winners. Please email me (or have one member of your team email me) at guillermo_bernardez@ucsb.edu so I can share access to the voting form. In your email, please include:
Before July 12, make sure that your submission respects all Submission Requirements laid out on the challenge page. Any submission that fails to meet this criteria will be automatically disqualified. |
In this PR we introduce a lifting from hypergraphs to combinatorial complexes which is universal with respect to a property (strictness) in the sense of category theory.
The Universal Strict Lifting does not introduce extra cells: every cell in the lifted CC corresponds to a hyperedge in the original hypergraph. Combinatorial complexes carry more information than hypergraphs, in the form of a rank function taking nonnegative values on each cell, satisfying a topological requirement (see [1]). The Universal Strict Lifting provides such a rank function in a deterministic manner.
Universality
Denote the categories*
$$\mathrm{Hyper} := (\text{hypergraphs}, \text{hypergraph homomorphisms})$$
$$\mathrm{CC}:= (\text{Combinatorial complexes}, \text{CC-homomorphisms})$$
Let$\mathrm{CC^{\mathrm{strict}}}$ consist of the (full) subcategory of $\mathrm{CC}$ consisting of combinatorial complexes where the rank condition is strict, that is:
We note that the strict category naturally contains the category of cell and simplicial complexes, where the dimensions of the cells provide the ranks.
The simplest nontrivial example is the comparison of a square (2-cell) and a tetrahedron (3-cell), both of which have the same number of nodes. See the tutorial for details on the implementation.
*: A hypergraph homomorphism is a mapping of the nodes that sends hyperedges to hyperedges and respects hyperedge inclusions. See [1] for definitions about CCs.
Universal property of the Universal Strict Lifting
Theorem:
$$\mathcal{L}: \mathrm{Hyper} \rightarrow \mathrm{CC^{\mathrm{strict}}} \text{ be \textbf{any} lifting which respects homomorphisms}$$
Let
Then there exists a homomorphism-preserving$\mathcal{F} : \mathrm{CC^{\mathrm{strict}}} \rightarrow \mathrm{CC^{\mathrm{strict}}}$ such that $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{F} \circ \mathcal{U}$ .
In other words, we can express any lifting from hypergraphs to strict CCs as a composition of our universal lifting with something else. This implies that$\mathcal{U}$ introduces the strictly necessary information needed to obtain a combinatorial complex in $\mathrm{CC}^{\mathrm{strict}}$ .