Conversation
Substitute the repolinter workflow with a comprehensive set of compliance and security checks. Project-specific exclusions are supported for non-applicable validations. This update also introduces a centrally-managed reusable workflow to streamline ongoing maintenance and ensure consistency. Signed-off-by: Neeraj Jetha <njetha@qti.qualcomm.com>
|
Please do not send push branch into this repo, instead use a forked tree to send pull request. We are not even supposed to have push/write access to the main repos. |
| exempt-issue-labels: bug,enhancement | ||
| exempt-pr-labels: bug,enhancement | ||
| days-before-stale: 30 | ||
| days-before-close: 7 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we've experimented with 'closing' stale issues on meta-qcom, and we did not like it, and reverted see qualcomm-linux/meta-qcom@43bcad8. I would prefer to follow that here as well
@mynameistechno we should probably revisit the default config for our repos and define a default branch protection rule to avoid new branches to be created this way. |
We could restrict branch creation except to users in a bypass list. @njjetha was most likely able to create the branch because he's a github admin, but it's very easy for a maintainer or anybody else to propose simple changes directly via the UI, so perhaps a rule should be added if we want to keep the branch namespace clean. Do you want me to turn that on? I could use the maintainer team as the bypass list? |
Yeah, I think this makes sense, +1 from me. |
Summary
qcom-preflight-checks calls a reusable-workflow that runs a series of preflight checks on your proposed contribution.
For more info check https://github.com/qualcomm/qcom-actions/blob/main/README.md