Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust vheap sizes for message handling processes in OTP 27 (backport #12208) #12508

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Oct 11, 2024

OTP 27 reset all assumptions on how the vm reacts to processes that
buffer and process a lot of large binaries.

Substantially increasing the vheap sizes for such process restores
most of the same performance by allowing processes to hold more binary
data before major garbage collections are triggered.

This introduces a new module to capture process flag configurations.

The new vheap sizes are only applied when running on OTP 27 or
above.


This is an automatic backport of pull request #12208 done by Mergify.

kjnilsson and others added 2 commits October 11, 2024 14:00
OTP 27 reset all assumptions on how the vm reacts to processes that
buffer and process a lot of large binaries.

Substantially increasing the vheap sizes for such process restores
most of the same performance by allowing processes to hold more binary
data before major garbage collections are triggered.

This introduces a new module to capture process flag configurations.

The new vheap sizes are only applied when running on OTP 27 or
above.

(cherry picked from commit 465b19e)
@mergify mergify bot added the bazel label Oct 11, 2024
@michaelklishin michaelklishin added this to the 4.0.3 milestone Oct 11, 2024
@michaelklishin michaelklishin merged commit 1608ab4 into v4.0.x Oct 11, 2024
199 checks passed
@michaelklishin michaelklishin deleted the mergify/bp/v4.0.x/pr-12208 branch October 11, 2024 19:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants