Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TextField component #511

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

TextField component #511

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kotAPI
Copy link
Collaborator

@kotAPI kotAPI commented Nov 1, 2024

WIP

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a customizable TextField component for text input with additional slots for content.
    • Added TextFieldInput, TextFieldRoot, and TextFieldSlot components for enhanced structure and styling.
  • Styles
    • Added new CSS class .rad-ui-text-field for styling the text field component.
    • Integrated text field styles into the default theme.
  • Documentation
    • Created Storybook stories for the TextField component, showcasing its functionality in various scenarios.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

A new TextField component has been added to the project, encapsulating a customizable text input field with various styling options. This component consists of three sub-components: TextFieldRoot, TextFieldInput, and TextFieldSlot, each serving specific functions within the input structure. Additionally, a Storybook configuration has been created to demonstrate the component's usage. Corresponding styles have been introduced to enhance the visual representation of the TextField in the application.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/components/ui/TextField/TextField.tsx Added TextField component with props for customization.
src/components/ui/TextField/fragments/TextFieldInput.tsx Introduced TextFieldInput component for rendering an input element with className prop.
src/components/ui/TextField/fragments/TextFieldRoot.tsx Created TextFieldRoot component for wrapping with customizable classes.
src/components/ui/TextField/fragments/TextFieldSlot.tsx Added TextFieldSlot component for rendering additional content within the text field.
src/components/ui/TextField/stories/TextField.stories.js Implemented Storybook configuration with stories for TextField, including All and WithForm variations.
styles/themes/components/text-field.scss Introduced new CSS class .rad-ui-text-field for styling the text field component.
styles/themes/default.scss Added import for text-field.scss to include styles in the overall theme.

Possibly related PRs

  • Added text component #452: The changes in this PR involve the addition of a Text component, which is relevant to the TextField component introduced in the main PR, as both are part of the UI component library and deal with text input/display functionalities.

Suggested reviewers

  • impirios

🐰 In a field of text so bright,
A new TextField takes its flight.
With roots and slots, it stands so tall,
Custom styles to please them all.
In stories told, its charm will show,
A joyful input, ready to grow! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.30%. Comparing base (3873c2b) to head (ce4e1fe).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #511   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.30%   92.30%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines          65       65           
  Branches       15       15           
=======================================
  Hits           60       60           
  Misses          5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 11

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
src/components/ui/TextField/fragments/TextFieldRoot.tsx (3)

7-10: Add JSDoc documentation for better developer experience.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the props interface, especially explaining the difference between className and customRootClass.

+/**
+ * Props for the TextFieldRoot component
+ * @property {string} [className] - Additional CSS classes to be applied
+ * @property {string} [customRootClass] - Custom class to override the default root class
+ */
 type TextFieldRootProps = React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement> & {
     className?: string;
     customRootClass?: string;
 };

17-17: Use a more specific display name.

Consider using a more specific display name to better identify this sub-component in React DevTools.

-TextFieldRoot.displayName = COMPONENT_NAME;
+TextFieldRoot.displayName = `${COMPONENT_NAME}Root`;

1-19: Consider enhancing component architecture.

As part of a compound component pattern, consider these improvements:

  1. Add React Context for sharing state between TextField components
  2. Implement proper accessibility roles and ARIA attributes
  3. Add runtime prop-types validation for non-TypeScript consumers

Example Context implementation:

import { createContext, useContext } from 'react';

type TextFieldContextType = {
  id?: string;
  disabled?: boolean;
  // Add other shared state
};

export const TextFieldContext = createContext<TextFieldContextType | undefined>(undefined);

export function useTextField() {
  const context = useContext(TextFieldContext);
  if (!context) {
    throw new Error('TextField components must be used within a TextField');
  }
  return context;
}
src/components/ui/TextField/TextField.tsx (2)

7-10: Add JSDoc documentation and consider type constraints.

The type definition would benefit from:

  1. JSDoc documentation explaining the purpose of each prop
  2. More specific type constraints for className and customRootClass
+/**
+ * Props for the TextField component
+ * @property {string} [className] - Additional CSS class for styling the input
+ * @property {string} [customRootClass] - Custom class for the root wrapper element
+ */
 type TextFieldProps = React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement> & {
     className?: string;
     customRootClass?: string;
 };

12-26: Consider implementing compound component pattern properly.

The current implementation with hardcoded slots limits flexibility. Consider implementing a proper compound component pattern.

Example usage pattern to support:

<TextField>
  <TextField.Slot>
    <SearchIcon />
  </TextField.Slot>
  <TextField.Input placeholder="Search..." />
  <TextField.Slot>
    <ClearButton />
  </TextField.Slot>
</TextField>

Would you like assistance in implementing this pattern?

src/components/ui/TextField/stories/TextField.stories.js (3)

13-17: Consider documenting supported props in the story.

While spreading props provides flexibility, explicitly documenting the supported props would improve the story's documentation value.

Add prop documentation using Storybook's argTypes:

 export default {
     title: 'Components/TextField',
     component: TextField,
-    render: (args) => <Template {...args} />
+    render: (args) => <Template {...args} />,
+    argTypes: {
+        className: { description: 'Additional CSS classes' },
+        // Add other supported props here
+    }
 };

19-20: Remove unnecessary comment.

The link to Storybook documentation doesn't add value here as it's standard boilerplate.

-// More on writing stories with args: https://storybook.js.org/docs/react/writing-stories/args

46-47: Remove empty args object.

The empty args object doesn't provide any value and can be removed.

 export const WithForm = WithFormTemplate.bind({});
-WithForm.args = {
-};
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3873c2b and ce4e1fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • src/components/ui/TextField/TextField.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/ui/TextField/fragments/TextFieldInput.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/ui/TextField/fragments/TextFieldRoot.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/ui/TextField/fragments/TextFieldSlot.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/ui/TextField/stories/TextField.stories.js (1 hunks)
  • styles/themes/components/text-field.scss (1 hunks)
  • styles/themes/default.scss (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • styles/themes/components/text-field.scss
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/ui/TextField/fragments/TextFieldSlot.tsx (1)

7-7: LGTM!

The default export is appropriate for this single-component file.

src/components/ui/TextField/fragments/TextFieldRoot.tsx (1)

3-3: Verify the ~ path alias configuration.

The ~ path alias needs to be properly configured in your build tools (webpack/vite/tsconfig) to ensure consistent resolution across different environments.

src/components/ui/TextField/stories/TextField.stories.js (2)

1-6: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized.

The imports follow a logical grouping pattern and all imported components are utilized in the stories.


7-11: LGTM! Storybook configuration follows best practices.

The story configuration properly sets up the component metadata and uses a template for consistent rendering.

styles/themes/default.scss (2)

17-17: LGTM! Import placement follows existing patterns.

The text-field styles import is correctly positioned alphabetically among other component imports.


Line range hint 28-33: Consider uncommenting and updating focus styles for accessibility.

The commented-out focus styles could be important for the TextField component's accessibility. Consider updating and re-enabling these styles to ensure proper keyboard navigation and focus indicators.

Let's check if there are any other focus-related styles that might compensate for this:

Consider implementing consistent focus styles that meet WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 2.4.7 (Focus Visible). The styles should:

  • Be sufficiently visible (high contrast)
  • Indicate the focused element clearly
  • Be consistent across all interactive elements

Comment on lines +3 to +5
const TextFieldSlot = ({ children }: React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>) => {
return <div className="rad-ui-text-field-slot">{children}</div>;
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve component typing and props handling.

The component could benefit from more precise typing and proper props handling:

  1. The component should explicitly type children and spread other HTML attributes
  2. Consider adding explicit return type annotation

Consider this improved implementation:

-const TextFieldSlot = ({ children }: React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>) => {
-    return <div className="rad-ui-text-field-slot">{children}</div>;
+type TextFieldSlotProps = {
+    children: React.ReactNode;
+} & Omit<React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>, 'children'>;
+
+const TextFieldSlot: React.FC<TextFieldSlotProps> = ({ children, className, ...props }) => {
+    return (
+        <div 
+            className={['rad-ui-text-field-slot', className].filter(Boolean).join(' ')}
+            {...props}
+        >
+            {children}
+        </div>
+    );
};

This change:

  • Explicitly types the children prop
  • Properly handles className merging
  • Spreads remaining HTML attributes
  • Adds explicit return type annotation
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const TextFieldSlot = ({ children }: React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>) => {
return <div className="rad-ui-text-field-slot">{children}</div>;
};
type TextFieldSlotProps = {
children: React.ReactNode;
} & Omit<React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>, 'children'>;
const TextFieldSlot: React.FC<TextFieldSlotProps> = ({ children, className, ...props }) => {
return (
<div
className={['rad-ui-text-field-slot', className].filter(Boolean).join(' ')}
{...props}
>
{children}
</div>
);
};

Comment on lines +1 to +7
import React from 'react';

const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
return <input className={`${className}`} {...props} />;
};

export default TextFieldInput;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Export component type for better developer experience.

Consider exporting the component's type definition to improve TypeScript integration.

 import React from 'react';

+export type TextFieldInputProps = React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>;
+
-const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
+const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: TextFieldInputProps) => {
     return <input className={`${className}`} {...props} />;
 };

 export default TextFieldInput;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
import React from 'react';
const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
return <input className={`${className}`} {...props} />;
};
export default TextFieldInput;
import React from 'react';
export type TextFieldInputProps = React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>;
const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: TextFieldInputProps) => {
return <input className={`${className}`} {...props} />;
};
export default TextFieldInput;

Comment on lines +3 to +5
const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
return <input className={`${className}`} {...props} />;
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider integrating with the project's styling system.

The className handling could be improved by integrating with the project's styling system mentioned in the summary (rad-ui-text-field).

-const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
-    return <input className={`${className}`} {...props} />;
+const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
+    return <input className={`rad-ui-text-field__input ${className}`} {...props} />;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
return <input className={`${className}`} {...props} />;
};
const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
return <input className={`rad-ui-text-field__input ${className}`} {...props} />;
};

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance accessibility with ARIA attributes.

Consider adding appropriate ARIA attributes and role to improve accessibility.

 const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
-    return <input className={`${className}`} {...props} />;
+    return (
+        <input
+            className={`${className}`}
+            role="textbox"
+            aria-label={props['aria-label'] || 'text input'}
+            {...props}
+        />
+    );
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
return <input className={`${className}`} {...props} />;
};
const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
return (
<input
className={`${className}`}
role="textbox"
aria-label={props['aria-label'] || 'text input'}
{...props}
/>
);
};

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider handling controlled component behavior.

Since this is a form input component, it might be helpful to provide some built-in handling for controlled component patterns.

-const TextFieldInput = ({ className = '', ...props }: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) => {
-    return <input className={`${className}`} {...props} />;
+const TextFieldInput = ({
+    className = '',
+    value,
+    defaultValue,
+    onChange,
+    ...props
+}: TextFieldInputProps) => {
+    const isControlled = value !== undefined;
+    return (
+        <input
+            className={`${className}`}
+            value={isControlled ? value : undefined}
+            defaultValue={!isControlled ? defaultValue : undefined}
+            onChange={(e) => {
+                onChange?.(e);
+            }}
+            {...props}
+        />
+    );

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +12 to +15
const TextFieldRoot = ({ className = '', customRootClass = '', ...props }: TextFieldRootProps) => {
const rootClass = customClassSwitcher(customRootClass, COMPONENT_NAME);
return <div className={`${rootClass} ${className}`} {...props} />;
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using a class name utility library.

The current class name concatenation could lead to extra spaces and doesn't handle falsy values. Consider using a utility like clsx or classnames for more robust class name handling.

+import clsx from 'clsx';
+
 const TextFieldRoot = ({ className = '', customRootClass = '', ...props }: TextFieldRootProps) => {
     const rootClass = customClassSwitcher(customRootClass, COMPONENT_NAME);
-    return <div className={`${rootClass} ${className}`} {...props} />;
+    return <div className={clsx(rootClass, className)} {...props} />;
 };

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +1 to +5
import React from 'react';

import TextFieldRoot from './fragments/TextFieldRoot';
import TextFieldInput from './fragments/TextFieldInput';
import TextFieldSlot from './fragments/TextFieldSlot';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider importing types from fragment components.

For better type safety and maintainability, consider importing and re-exporting the types from your fragment components. This would make the API surface more explicit and help with documentation.

 import React from 'react';
 
 import TextFieldRoot from './fragments/TextFieldRoot';
 import TextFieldInput from './fragments/TextFieldInput';
 import TextFieldSlot from './fragments/TextFieldSlot';
+import type { TextFieldRootProps } from './fragments/TextFieldRoot';
+import type { TextFieldInputProps } from './fragments/TextFieldInput';
+import type { TextFieldSlotProps } from './fragments/TextFieldSlot';
+
+export type { TextFieldRootProps, TextFieldInputProps, TextFieldSlotProps };
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
import React from 'react';
import TextFieldRoot from './fragments/TextFieldRoot';
import TextFieldInput from './fragments/TextFieldInput';
import TextFieldSlot from './fragments/TextFieldSlot';
import React from 'react';
import TextFieldRoot from './fragments/TextFieldRoot';
import TextFieldInput from './fragments/TextFieldInput';
import TextFieldSlot from './fragments/TextFieldSlot';
import type { TextFieldRootProps } from './fragments/TextFieldRoot';
import type { TextFieldInputProps } from './fragments/TextFieldInput';
import type { TextFieldSlotProps } from './fragments/TextFieldSlot';
export type { TextFieldRootProps, TextFieldInputProps, TextFieldSlotProps };

Comment on lines +12 to +26
const TextField = ({ className = '', customRootClass = '', value, onChange, ...props }: TextFieldProps) => {
return (
<TextFieldRoot customRootClass={customRootClass} className={className}>
<TextFieldSlot>
slot 1
</TextFieldSlot>
{/* */}
<TextFieldInput type="text" value={value} onChange={onChange} {...props} />
{/* */}
<TextFieldSlot>
slot 2
</TextFieldSlot>
</TextFieldRoot>
);
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Component implementation needs significant improvements.

Several issues need to be addressed:

  1. Hardcoded slot content ("slot 1", "slot 2")
  2. Missing accessibility attributes
  3. Empty comments in JSX
  4. No error handling

Here's a suggested improvement:

-const TextField = ({ className = '', customRootClass = '', value, onChange, ...props }: TextFieldProps) => {
+const TextField = ({
+    className = '',
+    customRootClass = '',
+    value,
+    onChange,
+    'aria-label': ariaLabel,
+    ...props
+}: TextFieldProps) => {
     return (
-        <TextFieldRoot customRootClass={customRootClass} className={className}>
-            <TextFieldSlot>
-                slot 1
-            </TextFieldSlot>
-            {/*  */}
-            <TextFieldInput type="text" value={value} onChange={onChange} {...props} />
-            {/*  */}
-            <TextFieldSlot>
-                slot 2
-            </TextFieldSlot>
+        <TextFieldRoot customRootClass={customRootClass} className={className} role="group">
+            {props.children || (
+                <>
+                    <TextFieldSlot />
+                    <TextFieldInput
+                        type="text"
+                        value={value}
+                        onChange={onChange}
+                        aria-label={ariaLabel}
+                        {...props}
+                    />
+                    <TextFieldSlot />
+                </>
+            )}
         </TextFieldRoot>
     );
 };
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const TextField = ({ className = '', customRootClass = '', value, onChange, ...props }: TextFieldProps) => {
return (
<TextFieldRoot customRootClass={customRootClass} className={className}>
<TextFieldSlot>
slot 1
</TextFieldSlot>
{/* */}
<TextFieldInput type="text" value={value} onChange={onChange} {...props} />
{/* */}
<TextFieldSlot>
slot 2
</TextFieldSlot>
</TextFieldRoot>
);
};
const TextField = ({
className = '',
customRootClass = '',
value,
onChange,
'aria-label': ariaLabel,
...props
}: TextFieldProps) => {
return (
<TextFieldRoot customRootClass={customRootClass} className={className} role="group">
{props.children || (
<>
<TextFieldSlot />
<TextFieldInput
type="text"
value={value}
onChange={onChange}
aria-label={ariaLabel}
{...props}
/>
<TextFieldSlot />
</>
)}
</TextFieldRoot>
);
};

💡 Codebase verification

Add basic input validation and error handling to TextField component

The TextField component currently lacks input validation and error handling. Based on the codebase analysis:

  • The component extends React.InputHTMLAttributes but doesn't handle common input validation scenarios
  • No error state or error message display mechanism exists
  • No validation patterns or utilities are present in the codebase

Suggested improvements:

  • Add error and errorMessage props to TextFieldProps interface
  • Add visual error state handling in TextFieldRoot and TextFieldInput
  • Implement basic input validation based on HTML5 input attributes (required, pattern, minLength, etc.)
🔗 Analysis chain

Add error handling and validation.

The component should handle common error cases and validate props appropriately.

Let's check if there are any existing error handling patterns in the codebase:


Let me check the error handling pattern found and look for any prop validation patterns in the codebase.


Let me check the specific TextField interface and any existing validation patterns in similar input components.


Let me try one final search to understand the component's interface and validation patterns.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for error handling patterns in other components
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' 'try.*catch|throw.*Error|Error\(' src/components/

Length of output: 156


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific error handling in ProgressIndicator
rg -A 5 'throw new Error' src/components/ui/Progress/shards/ProgressIndicator.tsx

# Look for prop validation patterns, particularly with PropTypes or TypeScript
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_Props {
  $$$
}'

# Check for any validation utilities or helper functions
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' 'validate|isValid|check' src/

Length of output: 1684


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check TextField interface
rg -A 10 'interface TextFieldProps' src/

# Look for validation patterns in input-like components
rg -g '*.tsx' -A 10 'input.*value.*onChange' src/components/

# Check for any existing input validation examples
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = ({ value, onChange, $$ }) => {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 178


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the TextField type definitions
fd "TextField.tsx" --exec cat {}

# Look for any input validation patterns in the entire codebase
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' -B 2 -A 2 'onChange.*=.*\(.*\).*=>' src/

# Check for any prop validation utilities
fd -e ts -e tsx --exec grep -l "validate\|isValid" {} src/utils/

Length of output: 7164

Comment on lines +32 to +35
const handleSubmit = (e) => {
e.preventDefault();
console.log(value);
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace console.log with Storybook action.

Using console.log for form submission isn't ideal in Storybook stories.

+import { action } from '@storybook/addon-actions';
+
 const handleSubmit = (e) => {
     e.preventDefault();
-    console.log(value);
+    action('form-submitted')(value);
 };
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const handleSubmit = (e) => {
e.preventDefault();
console.log(value);
};
import { action } from '@storybook/addon-actions';
const handleSubmit = (e) => {
e.preventDefault();
action('form-submitted')(value);
};

Comment on lines +20 to +24
export const All = {
args: {
className: ''
}
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance the basic story to showcase component capabilities.

The current story with an empty className doesn't effectively demonstrate the TextField's features.

Consider expanding the story to show different states and use cases:

 export const All = {
     args: {
-        className: ''
+        placeholder: 'Enter text here',
+        defaultValue: 'Sample text',
+        disabled: false,
+        // Add other relevant props to showcase functionality
     }
 };

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant