Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create codeql.yml #52

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

Create codeql.yml #52

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

kovpack
Copy link
Member

@kovpack kovpack commented Aug 27, 2024

Motivation

  • We want to have custom config for codeql

Changes

  • Init config
  • Add custom config for codeql/init step

How to test

  • n/a

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced automated CodeQL analysis to identify vulnerabilities in the codebase.
    • Configured workflows to run analysis on code pushes, pull requests, and scheduled intervals.
  • Enhancements

    • Streamlined analysis by focusing on core application code and excluding test files.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a configuration for CodeQL analysis in the project, including a new configuration file that specifies which paths to include and ignore during the analysis. Additionally, a GitHub Actions workflow is established to automate the CodeQL analysis process, triggered by pushes and pull requests to the main branch, as well as on a scheduled basis. This workflow supports multiple programming languages and includes steps for repository checkout, CodeQL initialization, and analysis execution.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/codeql/codeql-config.yml Added configuration for CodeQL analysis, specifying included paths (src) and ignored paths (test files in src/__tests__).
.github/workflows/codeql.yml Introduced a GitHub Actions workflow for CodeQL analysis, defining triggers, job configurations, and analysis steps.

Suggested reviewers

  • vittorius
  • kovpack

Poem

In the burrow deep, where code does play,
A new path is forged, come what may.
With CodeQL's watchful eyes so bright,
Bugs and flaws shall take flight!
Hops of joy for tests set aside,
In clean code's embrace, we take pride! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/codeql.yml (2)

42-56: Effective use of matrix strategy and informative comments.

The matrix strategy is properly configured with fail-fast set to false, ensuring that the workflow continues running even if one of the matrix jobs fails. The inclusion of "javascript-typescript" with a build-mode of "none" is appropriate for the current setup.

The comments provide a useful reference for supported language values and guidance on customizing the analysis for different languages and build modes.

Consider adding more languages to the matrix if the repository contains code written in other supported languages. This will ensure comprehensive analysis across all relevant languages.


57-93: Comprehensive analysis steps with helpful fallbacks and examples.

The workflow steps cover all the necessary aspects of CodeQL analysis, from checking out the repository to initializing CodeQL with the appropriate settings and performing the actual analysis.

The commented-out examples for custom queries provide useful guidance for users who want to customize the analysis further.

The conditional manual build step is a thoughtful fallback for cases where automatic building fails, with clear instructions for users to replace the placeholder commands.

Consider removing the placeholder exit 1 command in the manual build step, as it will cause the workflow to fail if the user forgets to remove it when replacing the placeholder commands with their actual build commands.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b6e896 and 15728a8.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/codeql/codeql-config.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/codeql/codeql-config.yml (1)

1-7: LGTM!

The CodeQL configuration looks good:

  • The paths configuration correctly includes the src directory for analysis.
  • The paths-ignore configuration appropriately excludes the test files in the src/__tests__ directory with extensions .js, .ts, .jsx, and .tsx.

This configuration will ensure that the main source code is analyzed while avoiding potential noise from test implementations.

.github/workflows/codeql.yml (4)

1-11: Informative comments.

The comments provide clear guidance and context for users, highlighting the flexibility of the workflow file and the ability to customize it as needed. The prompt to verify the detected languages in the language matrix is a helpful reminder.


12-30: Well-defined workflow triggers and runner selection.

The workflow name, trigger events, and conditional runner selection are all properly configured. The comments about runner size and analysis time provide valuable insights and resources for optimization.


31-41: Properly scoped permissions.

The permissions are appropriately defined based on the requirements for the CodeQL workflow. Granting the necessary access to security events and packages while conditionally allowing read access to actions and contents for private repositories demonstrates good security practices.


66-66: Verify the existence of the custom CodeQL configuration file.

The workflow specifies a custom configuration file path for CodeQL: ./.github/codeql/codeql-config.yml. This allows for more granular control over CodeQL settings.

Please ensure that the specified configuration file exists at the given path in the repository. If the file is missing, the workflow may fail or use default settings.

Run the following script to verify the existence of the configuration file:

Verification successful

Custom CodeQL configuration file verified

The specified CodeQL configuration file '.github/codeql/codeql-config.yml' exists in the repository as expected. This confirms that the workflow is correctly referencing a valid custom configuration file for CodeQL analysis.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash

# Check if the CodeQL configuration file exists
if [ ! -f ".github/codeql/codeql-config.yml" ]; then
  echo "The CodeQL configuration file '.github/codeql/codeql-config.yml' does not exist."
  echo "Please make sure to create the file at the specified path."
  exit 1
else
  echo "The CodeQL configuration file '.github/codeql/codeql-config.yml' exists."
fi

Length of output: 210

@VladimirTaytor VladimirTaytor merged commit d0d2336 into main Sep 18, 2024
4 checks passed
@VladimirTaytor VladimirTaytor deleted the kovpack-patch-1 branch September 18, 2024 11:44
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants