Skip to content

Conversation

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member

Why are these changes needed?

This PR is based on #4187 and introduces high level project structure for history server. Mainly opening this PR to make it easier to break up #4187 into smaller reviewable PRs

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

andrewsykim commented Nov 26, 2025

@KunWuLuan PTAL, this is a PR just to introduce project folders. Ideally we can open a separate PR per folder based on the PR you already have open: #4187

@andrewsykim andrewsykim force-pushed the history-server-setup branch 3 times, most recently from 3d8223e to 3fd4a41 Compare November 26, 2025 21:44
@400Ping
Copy link
Contributor

400Ping commented Nov 27, 2025

Thanks, I think this is very helpful when reviewing.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Sy Kim <andrewsy@google.com>
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
package eventserver
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will event collector be a better name?
I am ok with both

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we can merge this first, and @KunWuLuan can change the directory and project structure if they want?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

eventserver is different from collector. @chiayi is working on a POC of how to process events from storage into server-side state

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you!

@andrewsykim andrewsykim merged commit 45c3afe into ray-project:master Nov 27, 2025
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants