Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support optional INTO keyword in bigquery INSERT statement #694

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2025

Conversation

reata
Copy link
Owner

@reata reata commented Mar 9, 2025

Closes #693

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.55%. Comparing base (e9e3048) to head (a1858ad).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #694   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.55%   99.55%           
=======================================
  Files          41       41           
  Lines        2245     2245           
=======================================
  Hits         2235     2235           
  Misses         10       10           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@reata reata merged commit b1782cc into master Mar 9, 2025
32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Target table is empty for BigQuery INSERT statement
1 participant