Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR-60: Solve Guincorn security issue #71

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2024

Conversation

PRodriguezFlores
Copy link
Contributor

  • Upgraded Gunicorn version to comapt with 22.0.0

@auto-assign auto-assign bot requested review from malvads and manegron May 24, 2024 09:59
@the-label-bot the-label-bot bot added the size/XS size/XS label May 24, 2024
Copy link

the-label-bot bot commented May 24, 2024

The Label Bot has predicted the following:

Category Value Confidence Applied Label
Kind Unknown Too Low ✖️
Size XS 0.997 ✔️

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.13%. Comparing base (8c89d96) to head (e4ff7ef).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #71   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.13%   83.13%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines         753      753           
=======================================
  Hits          626      626           
  Misses        127      127           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@malvads malvads merged commit 2728fea into master May 26, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@PRodriguezFlores PRodriguezFlores deleted the solve_guincorn_security_issue branch June 4, 2024 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/XS size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants