Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add highlighting for dict{} literal #934

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

DZakh
Copy link
Contributor

@DZakh DZakh commented Feb 29, 2024

No description provided.

@@ -297,10 +297,10 @@
}
]
},
"list": {
"entity-literal": {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you have some better name suggestions?

@zth
Copy link
Collaborator

zth commented Sep 1, 2024

@DZakh old one but dict literal support is finally merged. Ok to merge this one now from your end? Could you add a changelog entry?

@zth
Copy link
Collaborator

zth commented Sep 2, 2024

@DZakh could you rebase and add the changelog entry under a new master headline?

@zth zth merged commit 1d16309 into rescript-lang:master Sep 3, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants