1350 category overview database

[ewan-escience]

Backend functions for software and project overviews per category

Changes proposed in this pull request

• Upgrade Postgres from 15.7 to 15.9
• Upgrade PostgREST from v12.2.2 to v12.2.3
• Add database functions that show all categories of software and projects (including categories that are not assigned directly but are a parent of an assigned category)

How to test

• docker compose down --volumes && docker compose build --parallel && docker compose up --scale data-generation=0
• Sign in as admin, create an organisation, add three levels of categories
• Create a project, publish it, add the organiation, add its lowest level category
• On http://localhost/api/v1/category_for_project?select=*,project(title),category(short_name,name), you should see only one entry
• On http://localhost/api/v1/rpc/projects_of_category?select=*,project(title),category(short_name,name) you should see three entries, as the parents of the category are also shown
• Do the same with a software page, the URLs to check are http://localhost/api/v1/category_for_software?select=*,software(brand_name),category(short_name,name) and http://localhost/api/v1/rpc/software_of_category?select=*,software(brand_name),category(short_name,name) respectively
• Now we will use a populated RSD:
• docker compose down --volumes && docker compose up --scale data-generation=1
• http://localhost/api/v1/rpc/projects_of_category and http://localhost/api/v1/rpc/software_of_category should take about half a second to load.
• We should maybe disable JIT, because those endpoints are faster when JIT is disabled (run ALTER DATABASE "rsd-db" SET JIT = OFF; or use the value of POSTGRES_DB in your .env and then run docker compose kill -s SIGUSR1 backend)

Implements the first step of #1350

PR Checklist:

• Increase version numbers in docker-compose.yml
• Link to a GitHub issue
• Update documentation
• Tests

[ewan-escience]

I'm a bit afraid that using the SETOF return type might cause the same problems as was fixed in #1299, but this was the only way to get resource embedding to work.

[dmijatovic]

Nice work!

I have not tested JIT. Maybe we can do load test using most used endpoints to get better idea about JIT performance?

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed for 'rsd-database'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud