Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade rules_file #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2024
Merged

Upgrade rules_file #9

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

pauldraper
Copy link
Collaborator

Ignore GNU untar header errors

WORKSPACE.bazel Outdated

http_archive(
name = "rules_file",
sha256 = "9108bf11fe1063bb6268f15506ea35c1a29e03cae651032d1da3d0f33561c5fd",
sha256 = "ee31f2ebcd09e289090420012d19ffaecb71c005e74f511301f1fd47cbd5f971",
strip_prefix = "rules_file-%s" % FILE_VERSION,
url = "https://github.com/hello-seer/rules_file/archive/%s.zip" % FILE_VERSION,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have rules_javascript's rules_file pulling from a fork of rivet's rules_file. Feels kind of messy, what's going on?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, didn't realize, we just need to put those changes back into Rivet's.

I'll look at that.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes were already in rivethealth/rules_file. I updated the URL to use that.

Ignore GNU untar header errors
@pauldraper pauldraper force-pushed the pauldraper/rules-file branch from ca20222 to 25d622b Compare January 8, 2024 05:00
@pauldraper pauldraper merged commit 4253b79 into main Jan 9, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants