Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): add semantic release #10

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

chore(ci): add semantic release #10

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

MSevey
Copy link
Collaborator

@MSevey MSevey commented Sep 25, 2024

Overview

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an automated release process using GitHub Actions, streamlining the creation of releases and generation of release notes.
  • Chores

    • Added a configuration file for semantic release to support non-NPM projects.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow named semantic_release.yml has been added to automate the release process for the project. This workflow is triggered on pushes to the main branch and includes a job that checks out the repository, configures semantic release with a specific JSON structure, and creates a release using the cycjimmy/semantic-release-action. The setup facilitates analyzing commits, generating release notes, and publishing releases to GitHub.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/semantic_release.yml Introduced a new workflow to automate the release process, including checkout, configuration, and release creation steps.

Poem

In the garden where code does bloom,
A workflow dances, dispelling gloom.
With each commit, a release takes flight,
Semantic magic, oh what a sight!
Hopping along, we celebrate this cheer,
For every push brings new joy near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RollkitBot RollkitBot requested review from a team, yarikbratashchuk, gupadhyaya and Manav-Aggarwal and removed request for a team September 25, 2024 15:14
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/semantic_release.yml (3)

12-13: LGTM with suggestion: Consider optimizing checkout.

The use of actions/checkout@v4 is appropriate and up-to-date. However, for release workflows, you might not need the entire git history.

Consider adding the fetch-depth: 0 option to fetch all history for all branches and tags, which is often necessary for semantic release to work correctly:

- name: Checkout
  uses: actions/checkout@v4
  with:
    fetch-depth: 0

14-24: LGTM with suggestions: Semantic release configuration and execution.

The semantic release configuration and execution are well-implemented:

  • The workaround for non-npm projects is correctly applied.
  • The use of cycjimmy/semantic-release-action@v4 is up-to-date.
  • The GITHUB_TOKEN is correctly passed for authentication.

However, there are a few points for improvement:

  1. The branches configuration in the action is redundant as it's already defined in the .releaserc.json file. You can remove lines 23-24.

  2. Consider adding more plugins to the .releaserc.json configuration for a more comprehensive release process. For example:

- name: Configure Semantic Release
  run: |
    echo '{
      "branches": ["main"],
      "plugins": [
        "@semantic-release/commit-analyzer",
        "@semantic-release/release-notes-generator",
        "@semantic-release/github",
        ["@semantic-release/git", {
          "assets": ["package.json"],
          "message": "chore(release): ${nextRelease.version} [skip ci]\n\n${nextRelease.notes}"
        }]
      ]
    }' > .releaserc.json

This configuration adds the @semantic-release/git plugin to update the package.json file (if applicable) and create a release commit.

  1. If your project uses a package.json file, consider adding a step to install dependencies:
- name: Install dependencies
  run: npm ci

Place this step before the "Create Release" step.


1-24: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for improvement.

The workflow successfully implements semantic release for the project. It uses up-to-date actions and follows good practices. However, there are a few areas where it could be improved:

  1. Consider adding build and test steps before the release to ensure the released version is stable and functional.
  2. If applicable, add steps to generate and publish documentation.
  3. Consider adding a step to update the changelog if it's not handled by the semantic release plugins.

Here's an example of how you might structure these additional steps:

jobs:
  release:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Set up Node.js
        uses: actions/setup-node@v3
        with:
          node-version: 'lts/*'

      - name: Install dependencies
        run: npm ci

      - name: Run tests
        run: npm test

      - name: Build
        run: npm run build

      # ... (existing semantic release steps)

      - name: Update documentation
        run: npm run docs

      - name: Deploy documentation
        uses: peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@v3
        with:
          github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
          publish_dir: ./docs

These additions would make the release process more robust and comprehensive.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3facff and d66ae9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/semantic_release.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/semantic_release.yml (2)

1-6: LGTM: Workflow name and trigger are well-defined.

The workflow name "Semantic Release" is clear and descriptive. The trigger on pushes to the main branch is appropriate for a release workflow, ensuring that releases are created only when changes are merged into the main branch.


8-10: LGTM: Job setup is appropriate.

The job name "release" clearly indicates its purpose. Using the latest Ubuntu runner (ubuntu-latest) is a good practice, ensuring the workflow runs on an up-to-date environment.

@MSevey MSevey enabled auto-merge (squash) September 25, 2024 15:43
@MSevey MSevey merged commit c432821 into main Sep 26, 2024
14 checks passed
@MSevey MSevey deleted the semantic-release branch September 26, 2024 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants