Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixing to reuse the available function #595

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

alexjavabraz
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR solves the security comment above:

Vadym Kolisnichenko commented:

Hey Alex Simas Braz ,

qq: do you know what was the reason to replace const estimatedFee = await getEstimatedFee(); with this calculation onst estimatedFee = pegoutQueueCount > 0 ? nextPegoutCost / pegoutQueueCount : 0; in actions.ts 22528d0#diff-677ba70779b5e66e7a47e4c6e9409baf147aa156a4bb85ad860a7dd152b26003L33

@alexjavabraz alexjavabraz self-assigned this Nov 3, 2023
lserra-iov
lserra-iov previously approved these changes Nov 8, 2023
@ronaldsg20 ronaldsg20 force-pushed the fix/security-concern1 branch 2 times, most recently from 47f9242 to 2d30bce Compare November 8, 2023 15:43
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 8, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@alexjavabraz alexjavabraz merged commit 010f167 into main Nov 8, 2023
@alexjavabraz alexjavabraz deleted the fix/security-concern1 branch November 8, 2023 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants