Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mark RFC-3192 (aka the 'provide_any' feature) as rejected #3460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions text/3192-dyno.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,6 +3,14 @@
- RFC PR: [rust-lang/rfcs#3192](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3192)
- Rust Issue: [rust-lang/rust#96024](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96024)

# This RFC was previously approved, but part of it later **rejected**

The `Provider` interface that is core to this proposal has been rejected for now by [the libs team meeting]. Without that element, what remains here is essentially just the `Demand` type (being renamed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113464 to `Request`). Without `Provider`, `Demand`/`Request` is only usable by types defined within the standard library itself as is the case in the [error_generic_member_access] feature proposal. Since `error_generic_member_access` is the only known (at the time of writing this) feature using `Demand`/`Request`, the [decision] was made to track it in the `error_generic_member_access` feature and mark this as rejected for now.

[error_generic_member_access]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2895
[the libs team meeting]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96024
[decision]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96024#issuecomment-1629794600

# Summary
[summary]: #summary

Expand Down