-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 909
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
api: add ApplicationHandler::as_any
#3851
Conversation
This could be used to subscribe for custom events.
Example on how to use it #3852 |
/// Get the [`ApplicationHandler`] as mutable [`Any`]. | ||
/// | ||
/// This is required to be implemented when platform specific traits are desired. | ||
#[inline(always)] | ||
fn as_any(&mut self) -> Option<&mut dyn Any> { | ||
None | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I played around a bit to figure out how we can get rid of this:
daxpedda@3740148
Mostly inspired by upcast
.
I'm warming up to the VTable idea, but I couldn't find any documentation on how stable this is, so I'm unsure what the proposal around this was exactly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm warming up to the VTable idea, but I couldn't find any documentation on how stable this is, so I'm unsure what the proposal around this was exactly.
vtable is only for completely out of tree stuff, for regular staff you don't need vtables, since users will have Option<dyn Handler>
and you can just if let
it. But function pointers are completely safe and stable, there's nothing wrong with them and they are all completely safe code.
it's just in the current state of things I decided with vtable, since it won't affect other APIs and for entirely platform specific staff I'd use this approach unless we have separate crates.
We can have -> Option<&mut dyn MacOSApplicationHandler>
from the ApplicationHandler
itself already, and it's vtable free.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah okay, I was thinking of totally different things.
I would like to avoid having to use register_x()
entirely. That is possible by unsafely reading the VTable and figuring out at runtime if a trait is implemented for a certain type.
This is already present on master. |
This could be used to subscribe for custom events.