Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: migrate to ESM #672

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 2, 2023
Merged

feat!: migrate to ESM #672

merged 8 commits into from
Nov 2, 2023

Conversation

mdonnalley
Copy link
Contributor

@mdonnalley mdonnalley commented Oct 26, 2023

What does this PR do?

Migrate to ESM

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

@W-14374756@

BREAKING CHANGES: ESM and node 18 minimum
package.json Outdated
@@ -38,25 +36,26 @@
"husky": "^7.0.4",
"mocha": "^9.1.3",
"nyc": "^15.1.0",
"oclif": "^3.17.2",
"oclif": "^4.0.3",
"prettier": "^2.8.8",
"pretty-quick": "^3.1.0",
"shx": "0.3.4",
"sinon": "10.0.0",
"swc": "^1.0.11",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since bin/dev is way different now, does that mean we don't need swc anymore?

@mshanemc
Copy link
Contributor

mshanemc commented Oct 27, 2023

QA: commands seem to work fine via bin/dev and bin/run

When I open the new eslint.cjs file TS doesn't like it. Maybe it needs to exclude something, OR include .cjs?

Screenshot 2023-10-27 at 9 11 53 AM

outside of this PR's changes:
Commands names are wrong
messages aren't following the naming convention
targetOrg messages aren't used

PR to this PR to fix those #673

@mshanemc mshanemc merged commit 2e8cdf0 into main Nov 2, 2023
7 checks passed
@mshanemc mshanemc deleted the mdonnalley/esm branch November 2, 2023 18:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants