Add CDDLPlusGPLClasspath to LicenseCategory.all #131
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If people want to discuss this, it should be a separate https://github.com/sbt/sbt-license-report/discussions/ topic, not a side show on a pull request. |
|
@eed3si9n Discussions are not enabled in this repo. |
|
Enabled it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Because this object was missing from
LicenseCategory.alldependencies with that license were not parsed correctly.As an aside, is there an explicit policy for what licenses can be included in the default allowlist? It seems most weak copyleft licenses are not included with the exception of EPL and Mozilla. I personally can't think of a usecase where simply pulling a weak copyleft dependency would be problematic.