Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sbt-license-report-31 Add a link to the homepage of a dependency. #32

Closed

Conversation

NicolasRouquette
Copy link

- bumped sbt version to 0.13.12
- implemented sbt#31 as described
@lightbend-cla-validator

Hi @NicolasRouquette,

Thank you for your contribution! We really value the time you've taken to put this together.

Before we proceed with reviewing this pull request, please sign the Typesafe Contributors License Agreement:

http://www.lightbend.com/contribute/cla

@NicolasRouquette
Copy link
Author

I signed the Lightbend / Typesafe CLA with approval from JPL/Caltech.

@@ -7,11 +7,11 @@ excludeDependencies += SbtExclusionRule(organization = "org.scala-lang")

TaskKey[Unit]("check") := {
val contents = sbt.IO.read(target.value / "license-reports" / "example-licenses.md")
if (!contents.contains("[The Apache Software License, Version 2.0](http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt) | com.fasterxml.jackson.core # jackson-databind # 2.5.4"))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you have to change this from databind to core? I believe that databind was chosen specifically for this test

@benmccann
Copy link
Contributor

This PR will need to be rebased. It would probably be nice to separate the formatting cleanup and SBT upgrade from the implementation of a new feature into separate PRs

kbedel added a commit to kbedel/sbt-license-report that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2018
Minimal fix for sbt#31 without the extra stuff in sbt#32
@benmccann
Copy link
Contributor

Closing due to inactivity. Please feel free to reopen after rebasing and addressing the comments

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants