fix: Using the Recommended Error Determination #1546
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request primarily focus on enhancing error handling across multiple files within the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ORM
participant Database
Client->>ORM: Request for data
ORM->>Database: Query for data
Database-->>ORM: Return data or error
ORM->>ORM: Check for gorm.ErrRecordNotFound
ORM->>ORM: Use errors.Is() for error handling
ORM-->>Client: Return data or error
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
bridge-history-api/internal/orm/batch_event.go (3)
Line range hint
49-53: LGTM: Improved error handling.The update to use
errors.Is()for checkinggorm.ErrRecordNotFoundis a good practice. It aligns with Go 1.13+ error handling recommendations.Consider updating the error message to be more specific:
return 0, fmt.Errorf("failed to get batch synced height in db: %w", err)This change removes the redundant "error:" text, as
%walready includes the error string.
Line range hint
66-70: LGTM: Consistent error handling improvement.The update to use
errors.Is()for checkinggorm.ErrRecordNotFoundis consistent with the previous function and follows good practices.Consider updating the error message for consistency:
return 0, fmt.Errorf("failed to get last updated finalized block height: %w", err)This change removes the redundant "error:" text, as
%walready includes the error string.
Inconsistent Error Message Regarding Block Height Comparison
The error message in
bridge-history-api/internal/logic/event_update.gouses>=instead of<=, which is inconsistent with theGetUnupdatedFinalizedBatchesLEBlockHeightfunction's logic.
Update the error message to use
<=to match the function's behavior:log.Error("failed to get unupdated finalized batches <= block height", "error", err)🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
85-89: LGTM: Consistent error handling improvement with minor suggestions.The update to use
errors.Is()for checkinggorm.ErrRecordNotFoundis consistent with the previous functions and follows good practices.Consider the following improvements:
- Update the error message for consistency and accuracy:
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get unupdated finalized batches <= block height: %w", err)This change removes the redundant "error:" text and corrects ">=" to "<=" to match the function name.
- Consider renaming the function to
GetUnupdatedFinalizedBatchesLTEBlockHeightfor clarity, as it includes batches with end block numbers less than or equal to the given height.To ensure the function name accurately reflects its behavior, let's verify the SQL query:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the SQL query in GetUnupdatedFinalizedBatchesLEBlockHeight # Test: Search for the SQL query in the function rg -A 10 'GetUnupdatedFinalizedBatchesLEBlockHeight'Length of output: 2673
bridge-history-api/internal/orm/cross_message.go (1)
Line range hint
88-92: LGTM: Improved error handling.The update to use
errors.Is(err, gorm.ErrRecordNotFound)is a good improvement in error handling. It correctly identifies wrapped errors and aligns with Go's recommended practices.For consistency, consider updating the error message in the
fmt.Errorfcall to use%vfor the error:- return 0, fmt.Errorf("failed to get latest processed height, type: %v, error: %w", messageType, err) + return 0, fmt.Errorf("failed to get latest processed height, type: %v, error: %v", messageType, err)This change would make the error formatting consistent with other error messages in the file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- bridge-history-api/internal/orm/batch_event.go (4 hunks)
- bridge-history-api/internal/orm/cross_message.go (4 hunks)
- coordinator/internal/orm/prover_block_list.go (2 hunks)
- coordinator/internal/orm/prover_task.go (2 hunks)
- rollup/internal/orm/bundle.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (15)
coordinator/internal/orm/prover_block_list.go (1)
69-69: Excellent update to error handling!The change from direct comparison to
errors.Is(err, gorm.ErrRecordNotFound)is a great improvement. This approach aligns with Go's recommended practices for error handling since Go 1.13. It allows for more robust error checking, especially when dealing with wrapped errors.This modification enhances the code's reliability without altering the method's overall logic or control flow. Well done!
bridge-history-api/internal/orm/batch_event.go (2)
5-5: LGTM: Import oferrorspackage.The addition of the
errorspackage import is correct and necessary for the updated error handling usingerrors.Is().
Line range hint
1-150: Overall: Consistent improvement in error handling.The changes in this file successfully implement the recommended error determination practices using
errors.Is(). This update enhances the robustness of error handling across multiple functions without altering their core logic. The consistency of these changes contributes to improved code quality and maintainability.While the primary objectives of the PR have been met, there are minor opportunities for further refinement in error messages and function naming for increased clarity and consistency.
Great job on implementing these improvements!
coordinator/internal/orm/prover_task.go (3)
5-5: LGTM: Import oferrorspackage.The addition of the
errorspackage import is appropriate and necessary for the updated error handling in theIsProverAssignedmethod.
64-64: LGTM: Improved error checking inIsProverAssigned.The update to use
errors.Is(err, gorm.ErrRecordNotFound)instead of direct comparison is a good improvement. This change:
- Aligns with Go 1.13+ best practices for error handling.
- Provides more robust error checking, capable of identifying wrapped errors.
- Maintains the existing functionality and control flow of the method.
This modification enhances the code's reliability without introducing any breaking changes.
Line range hint
1-284: Summary of changes inprover_task.goThe changes in this file improve error handling in the
IsProverAssignedmethod by adopting the recommended practices for error determination in Go 1.13+. The modifications are:
- Addition of the
errorspackage import.- Update of the error check in
IsProverAssignedto useerrors.Is().These changes enhance the robustness of error handling without altering the overall functionality of the
ProverTaskstruct or its methods. The improvements are consistent with similar updates in other files mentioned in the PR summary.rollup/internal/orm/bundle.go (7)
70-73: Improved error handling ingetLatestBundleThe changes in this function align with the PR objective of using recommended error determination. The use of
errors.Is()for checkinggorm.ErrRecordNotFoundis a best practice. The error message has also been improved for better traceability.
Line range hint
134-138: Enhanced error handling inGetFirstPendingBundleThe changes in this function are consistent with the PR objective. The use of
errors.Is()for checkinggorm.ErrRecordNotFoundis a recommended practice. The error message has been improved to provide more context, which will aid in debugging and traceability.
Line range hint
220-222: Improved error message inUpdateFinalizeTxHashAndRollupStatusThe error message has been enhanced to include more context (bundle hash, status, and finalizeTxHash). This improvement will greatly aid in debugging and traceability, aligning with the overall goal of enhancing error handling in the codebase.
Line range hint
246-248: Enhanced error message inUpdateProvingStatusThe error message now includes additional context (bundle hash and status). This improvement enhances debugging capabilities and error traceability, which is in line with the overall objective of refining error handling in the codebase.
Line range hint
264-266: Improved error message inUpdateRollupStatusThe error message has been enhanced to include additional context (bundle hash and status). This improvement will facilitate easier debugging and better error traceability, which aligns with the overall goal of enhancing error handling in the codebase.
Line range hint
290-292: Enhanced error message inUpdateProofAndProvingStatusByHashThe error message now includes the bundle hash, which provides more context for debugging. This improvement aligns with the overall objective of enhancing error handling and traceability in the codebase.
Line range hint
1-293: Overall improvements in error handling and messagingThe changes in this file consistently enhance error handling and improve error messages across multiple functions. These improvements include:
- Using
errors.Is()for checkinggorm.ErrRecordNotFound, which aligns with Go's recommended practices for error determination.- Adding more context to error messages, such as including bundle hashes, statuses, and other relevant information.
These changes will significantly improve debugging capabilities and error traceability throughout the codebase. The modifications are in line with the PR objectives and represent a positive step towards more robust error management.
bridge-history-api/internal/orm/cross_message.go (2)
5-5: LGTM: Import oferrorspackage.The addition of the
errorspackage import is appropriate for the new error handling approach usingerrors.Is(). This change aligns with the PR objectives to improve error determination.
112-115: LGTM: Improved error handling.The update to use
errors.Is(err, gorm.ErrRecordNotFound)is a good improvement in error handling. It correctly identifies wrapped errors and aligns with Go's recommended practices.
Purpose or design rationale of this PR
Reference: https://go.dev/blog/go1.13-errors
Avoid using the equals sign to determine the wrong way
PR title
Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:
Deployment tag versioning
Has
tagincommon/version.gobeen updated or have you addedbump-versionlabel to this PR?Breaking change label
Does this PR have the
breaking-changelabel?Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores
errorspackage to facilitate improved error handling practices.