Open
Conversation
Author
|
Happy new year and a friendly ping! |
Author
|
Another friendly ping! 15/17 of these pull-requests have been merged now, so I have faith again, we might make it to 100%. |
Author
|
Friendly ping! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The information in
<name>-pkg.eldid not agree with the information in<name>.el. This pull-requests addresses that be removing the outdated<name>-pkg.el.While the end-user package manager
package.elexpects a file<name>-pkg.el, this should only be generate by the package archive (such as GNU ELPA and MELPA), instead of being tracked in the upstream repository.The tools used maintain the various *ELPA, do not use
<name>-pkg.elas a data source, they only generate it.elpa-admin.el, the tool used for GNU ELPA and NonGNU ELPA, does not use<name>-pkg.elas a data source and it never has.package-build.el, the tool used for Melpa, prefers<name>.elbut currently falls back to get information missing from there from<name>-pkg.elinstead. I am goint to change that; soon<name>-pkg.elwill be ignored as a data source by this tool too.